Risk Assessment in Supply Chain Networks of China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)

被引:10
作者
Awan, Muhammad Asees [1 ]
Ali, Yousaf [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghulam Ishaq Khan Inst Engn Sci & Technol GIKI, GIK Inst, Sch Management Sci, Topi 23640, Khyber Pakhtoon, Pakistan
关键词
Risk assessment; SCN; CPEC; ISM; MICMAC; DESIGN; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; RESILIENCE; GREEN; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; BARRIERS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s41111-021-00199-w
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Complexities in today's Supply Chain Networks (SCN) have exposed them to various risks, vulnerabilities, and disruptions. Recently, the Chinese $62 billion investment in the wake of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which includes a network of highways and railways projects, will be a milestone for regional connectivity. Through CPEC, China aims to connect its north-western province Xinjiang to global supply chain networks via Gwadar port Pakistan. Since 9/11, Pakistan has become a terrorism stuck state, resulting in the loss of political and economic stability, reducing the infrastructure development and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Under these circumstances, risk assessment of supply chain networks in a responsive way toward these problems is crucial for authorities. This paper aims to identify and investigate the relationship between supply chain risks using the Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) technique. Additionally, interdependencies among risks have been calculated, and classification is done via cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) analysis based on corresponding dependency and driving power. Results show that political and economic stability has the highest driving power and lowest dependence power, indicating that all the risks are directly or indirectly associated with it. Simultaneously, epidemics and ecosystem changes have the highest dependence power and most insufficient driving power, which shows its significant dependency on other risks. Finally, based on our model, authorities can design a resilient supply chain network responsive to several risks, and efficient operations are assured.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 573
页数:24
相关论文
共 114 条
[61]   Supply chain strategies in an era of natural resource scarcity [J].
Kalaitzi, Dimitra ;
Matopoulos, Aristides ;
Bourlakis, Michael ;
Tate, Wendy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (03) :784-809
[62]  
Kalim D., 2020, S ASIAN STUD-UK, V31, P207
[63]  
Khan R., 2016, 15000 TROOPS SPECIAL
[64]   A proactive approach to supply chain risk management: Shifting orders among suppliers to mitigate the supply side risks [J].
Kirilmaz, Oguzhan ;
Erol, Serpil .
JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2017, 23 (01) :54-65
[65]   The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review [J].
Klibi, Walid ;
Martel, Alain ;
Guitouni, Adel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 203 (02) :283-293
[66]   Technology for supporting supply [J].
Kumar, K .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2001, 44 (06) :58-61
[67]   Melting glaciers bring energy uncertainty [J].
Laghari, Javaid R. .
NATURE, 2013, 502 (7473) :617-618
[68]   A review of integrated supply chain network design models: Key issues for vaccine supply chains [J].
Lemmens, Stef ;
Decouttere, Catherine ;
Vandaele, Nico ;
Bernuzzi, Mauro .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2016, 109 :366-384
[69]   Analysis of tour values to develop enablers using an interpretive hierarchy-based model in Taiwan [J].
Lin, Ling-Zhong ;
Yeh, Huery-Ren .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 34 :133-144
[70]   Toward resilient food systems through increased agricultural diversity and local sourcing in the Carolinas [J].
MacFall J. ;
Lelekacs J.M. ;
LeVasseur T. ;
Moore S. ;
Walker J. .
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2015, 5 (4) :608-622