Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis

被引:5
|
作者
Feng, Jian [1 ]
Cui, Naiqiang [2 ]
Wang, Zhenyu [3 ]
Duan, Jutao [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Nankai Hosp, Dept Emergency, Tianjin 300100, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Nankai Hosp, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg, 6 Yangtze River Rd, Tianjin 300100, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Nankai Hosp, Dept Minimally Invas Surg, Tianjin 300100, Peoples R China
关键词
single-incision laparoscopic surgery; conventional laparoscopic appendectomy; open appendectomy; acute appendicitis; network meta-analysis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CLINICAL-TRIAL; OUTCOMES; STANDARD;
D O I
10.3892/etm.2017.5343
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) and open appendectomy (OA) for the treatment of acute appendicitis. PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies comparing the effectiveness of different appendectomy methods for treating acute appendicitis published prior to April 2016. ADDIS 1.16.5 software was used for data analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-2 statistic. Odds ratios or standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled accordingly. Consistency was assessed using node-splitting analysis and inconsistency standard deviation. Convergence was assessed with the Brooks-Gelman-Rubin method using Potential Scale Reduction Factor (PSRF). Surgical procedure duration, duration of hospital stay, wound infection and incidence of abscesses were compared. A total of 24 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. A consistency model was used to pool data regarding the four outcomes. The PSRFs in each item were all <1.03. Pooled results showed that, compared with OA, SILS and CLA were associated with significantly shorter durations of hospital stay (all P<0.01) and lower risk of wound infection (SILS vs. OA P=0.02 and CLA vs. OA P<0.01, respectively), but no significant differences were identified between SILS and CLA. However, compared with OA, SILS exhibited a significantly longer surgical procedure duration (P=0.01) and lower incidence of abscesses (P=0.04), while no significant difference was observed between OA and CLA. This comprehensive network meta-analysis indicated that laparoscopic appendectomy, including SILS and CLA, may have more advantages for acute appendicitis compared with OA. Furthermore, SILS procedures require improvement and simplification to reduce the surgical procedure duration.
引用
收藏
页码:5908 / 5916
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis
    Guner, Osman S.
    Tumay, Latif, V
    Gurluler, Ercument
    CHIRURGIA-ITALY, 2020, 33 (04): : 185 - 188
  • [2] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy:Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu-Long Cai
    Xian-Ze Xiong
    Si-Jia Wu
    Yao Cheng
    Jiong Lu
    Jie Zhang
    Yi-Xin Lin
    Nan-Sheng Cheng
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (31) : 5165 - 5173
  • [3] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cai, Yu-Long
    Xiong, Xian-Ze
    Wu, Si-Jia
    Cheng, Yao
    Lu, Jiong
    Zhang, Jie
    Lin, Yi-Xin
    Cheng, Nan-Sheng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (31) : 5165 - 5173
  • [4] Meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy
    Pisanu, Adolfo
    Porceddu, Giulia
    Reccia, Isabella
    Saba, Alessandra
    Uccheddu, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 183 (02) : E49 - E59
  • [5] Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Kim, Ji Hoon
    Kim, Ho Young
    Park, Sung Kyun
    Lee, Jung Sun
    Heo, Dong Sik
    Park, Sang Wook
    Lee, Yoon Suk
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (06) : 1054 - 1058
  • [6] Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
    Antoniou, Stavros A.
    Koch, Oliver O.
    Antoniou, George A.
    Lasithiotakis, Konstantinos
    Chalkiadakis, George E.
    Pointner, Rudolph
    Granderath, Frank A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 207 (04): : 613 - 622
  • [7] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xue, Chaorong
    Lin, Bingqiang
    Huang, Zhengyuan
    Chen, Zhi
    SURGERY TODAY, 2015, 45 (09) : 1179 - 1186
  • [8] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chaorong Xue
    Bingqiang Lin
    Zhengyuan Huang
    Zhi Chen
    Surgery Today, 2015, 45 : 1179 - 1186
  • [9] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience
    Chouillard, Elie
    Dache, Arnaud
    Torcivia, Adriana
    Helmy, Nada
    Ruseykin, Ivan
    Gumbs, Andrew
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (08): : 1861 - 1865
  • [10] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience
    Elie Chouillard
    Arnaud Dache
    Adriana Torcivia
    Nada Helmy
    Ivan Ruseykin
    Andrew Gumbs
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 1861 - 1865