Manipulation of the Involvement Load of L2 Reading Tasks: A Useful Heuristic for Enhanced L2 Vocabulary Development

被引:1
作者
Namaziandost, Ehsan [1 ]
Sawalmeh, Murad Hassan Mohammed [2 ]
Tilwani, Shouket Ahmad [3 ]
Ziafar, Meisam [4 ]
Arianti, Arin [5 ]
Hernandez, Ronald M. [6 ]
Razzhivin, Oleg Anatolevich [7 ]
Ocana-Fernandez, Yolvi [8 ]
Fuster-Guillen, Doris [8 ]
Garay, Jessica Palacios [8 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Shahrekord Branch, Ahvaz, Iran
[2] Dhofar Univ, Salalah, Oman
[3] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz, Iran
[5] Univ Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
[6] Univ San Martin de Porres, Lima, Peru
[7] Kazan Fed Univ, Elabuga Inst, Moscow, Russia
[8] Univ Nacl Mayor San Marcos, Lima, Peru
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
ILH; L2 reading tasks skill; vocabulary knowledge; ACQUISITION; HYPOTHESIS;
D O I
10.1177/21582440211051723
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Ensuring second language (L2) learners have an adequate breadth and depth of L2 vocabulary knowledge is a key pedagogical objective in L2 learning contexts. For this reason, establishing guiding principles that successfully enhance the efficacy of L2 vocabulary knowledge development is of strong importance. The current study investigated the value of applying principles from the Involvement Load Hypothesis (ILH) as part of a reading comprehension task among 40 intermediate English as a foreign language (EFL) students. Half of the group undertook a high involvement reading task, whereas the other half undertook a low involvement reading task. After the reading task, an unannounced Vocabulary Knowledge Scale test was administered to measure incidental vocabulary gains. Results showed the high involvement group remarkably outflanked the low involvement groups in terms of the target words learned from the reading task. A delayed post-test indicated that the retention of target word knowledge was more robust among the high involvement group, but that this difference did not maintain a level of statistical significance after 2 weeks. We conclude with suggestions about how EFL/ESL instructors can apply the principles of the ILH in efforts to systematically enhance learners' L2 vocabulary knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Alaijani FA, 2020, ASIATIC, V14, P160
[2]  
Alqahtani M., 2015, International Journal of Teaching and Education, V3, P21
[3]  
Anderson R.C., 1981, Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews, P77, DOI DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2012.31007
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, 2nd Edn
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, DOI DOI 10.18488/JOURNAL.23.2019.83.99.109
[7]  
Anova C., 2015, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FKIP Prodi Bahasa Inggris, V1, P1
[8]  
Azadi G., 2018, J LANG TEACH LEARN, V9, P132, DOI [https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0901.17, DOI 10.17507/JLTR.0901.17]
[9]  
Bogaards P., 2004, Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing
[10]   The Effects of Repetition and L1 Lexicalization on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition [J].
Chen, Chuntien ;
Truscott, John .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2010, 31 (05) :693-713