Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: Clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization

被引:275
|
作者
Kim, Edwin H. [1 ]
Bird, J. Andrew [1 ]
Kulis, Michael [1 ]
Laubach, Susan [1 ]
Pons, Laurent [1 ]
Shreffler, Wayne [2 ]
Steele, Pamela [1 ]
Kamilaris, Janet [1 ]
Vickery, Brian [1 ]
Burks, A. Wesley [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Allergy & Immunol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Food Allergy Ctr MGH, Ctr Immunol & Inflammatory Dis, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Peanut allergy; sublingual immunotherapy; desensitization; food allergy; ANAPHYLACTIC REACTIONS; FOOD ALLERGY; DOUBLE-BLIND; KIWI FRUIT; FATALITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1083
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: There are no treatments currently available for peanut allergy. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a novel approach to the treatment of peanut allergy. Objective: We sought to investigate the safety, clinical effectiveness, and immunologic changes with SLIT in children with peanut allergy. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study subjects underwent 6 months of dose escalation and 6 months of maintenance dosing followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. Results: Eighteen children aged 1 to 11 years completed 12 months of dosing and the food challenge. Dosing side effects were primarily oropharyngeal and uncommonly required treatment. During the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, the treatment group safely ingested 20 times more peanut protein than the placebo group (median, 1,710 vs 85 mg; P = .011). Mechanistic studies demonstrated a decrease in skin prick test wheal size (P = .020) and decreased basophil responsiveness after stimulation with 10(-2) mu g/mL (P = .009) and 10(-3) mu g/mL (P = .009) of peanut. Peanut-specific IgE levels increased over the initial 4 months (P = .002) and then steadily decreased over the remaining 8 months (P = .003), whereas peanut-specific IgG4 levels increased during the 12 months (P = .014). Lastly, IL-5 levels decreased after 12 months (P = .015). No statistically significant changes were found in IL-13 levels, the percentage of regulatory T cells, or IL-10 and IFN-gamma production. Conclusion: Peanut SLIT is able to safely induce clinical desensitization in children with peanut allergy, with evidence of immunologic changes suggesting a significant change in the allergic response. Further study is required to determine whether continued peanut SLIT is able to induce long-term immune tolerance. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:640-6.)
引用
收藏
页码:640 / U153
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy in children: Clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization
    Kim, Edwin H.
    Yang, Luanna
    Ye, Ping
    Guo, Rishu
    Li, Quefeng
    Kulis, Michael D.
    Burks, A. Wesley
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 144 (05) : 1320 - +
  • [2] Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: Long-term follow-up of a randomized multicenter trial
    Burks, A. Wesley
    Wood, Robert A.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Sicherer, Scott H.
    Fleischer, David M.
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Liu, Andrew H.
    Henning, Alice K.
    Lindblad, Robert
    Dawson, Peter
    Plaut, Marshall
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 135 (05) : 1240 - U648
  • [3] Comparison of sublingual immunotherapy and oral immunotherapy in peanut allergy
    Zhang W.
    Sindher S.B.
    Sampath V.
    Nadeau K.
    Allergo Journal International, 2018, 27 (6) : 153 - 161
  • [4] Evidence for sustained desensitization after sublingual peanut immunotherapy
    Bohle, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 151 (06) : 1477 - 1478
  • [5] Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial
    Fleischer, David M.
    Burks, A. Wesley
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Wood, Robert A.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Sicherer, Scott H.
    Liu, Andrew H.
    Stablein, Donald
    Henning, Alice K.
    Mayer, Lloyd
    Lindblad, Robert
    Plaut, Marshall
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 131 (01) : 119 - U184
  • [6] Utility of component analyses in subjects undergoing sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy
    Burk, C. M.
    Kulis, M.
    Leung, N.
    Kim, E. H.
    Burks, A. W.
    Vickery, B. P.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2016, 46 (02) : 347 - 353
  • [7] Sublingual immunotherapy for food allergy and its future directions
    Schworer, Stephen A.
    Kim, Edwin H.
    IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2020, 12 (12) : 921 - 931
  • [8] A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: Clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response
    Varshney, Pooja
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Perry, Tamara T.
    Kemper, Alex
    Steele, Pamela
    Hiegel, Anne
    Kamilaris, Janet
    Carlisle, Suzanne
    Yue, Xiaohong
    Kulis, Mike
    Pons, Laurent
    Vickery, Brian
    Burks, A. Wesley
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 127 (03) : 654 - 660
  • [9] Immunotherapy approaches for peanut allergy
    Kim, Edwin H.
    Patel, Chirag
    Burks, A. Wesley
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 16 (02) : 167 - 174
  • [10] Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: The con argument
    Fiocchi, Alessandro
    Artesani, Maria Cristina
    Fierro, Vincenzo
    Riccardi, Carla
    Dahdah, Lamia
    Mennini, Maurizio
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (08):