Understanding trends in engineering design and design-based learning studies with a bibliometric approach

被引:1
作者
Delen, Ibrahim [1 ]
Yuksel, Tugba [2 ]
机构
[1] Usak Univ, Dept Educ Sci, Usak, Turkey
[2] Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Dept Sci Educ, Usak, Turkey
关键词
Engineering design; design based learning; teacher education; higher education; elementary/secondary education; ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION RESEARCH; SCHOOL SCIENCE; STEM; TECHNOLOGY; STUDENTS; THINKING; PERCEPTIONS; INTEGRATION; MOTIVATION; CURRICULUM;
D O I
10.1080/03043797.2022.2104695
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Understanding how engineering design (ED) and design-based learning (DBL) are portrayed at various educational levels is essential in this transition to ascertain the state of the literature. We investigated ED and DBL studies in Web of Science and Scopus databases. Then we focused on educational levels, categorizing research based on participant types: studies with elementary or secondary school students; undergraduate students; teachers or teacher candidates. The bibliometric analysis revealed that as undergraduate engineering programs give students a variety of options to engage in design, higher education studies continue to be the main focus of ED and DBL literature. The number of studies on elementary and secondary education has gradually expanded over the past ten years, with secondary education received the majority of attention. The smallest group in our analysis was the teacher education studies. The findings of this study depicts how the themes change based on participant groups. Science education become a key discipline in studies on elementary, secondary, and teacher education. Engineering design is not supported by one course in higher education programs and we do believe that supporting engineering in various grade levels/disciplines in elementary/secondary and teacher education would be beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1398
页数:19
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   A living systems analysis of student design projects at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) [J].
Ahari, P .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2006, 23 (03) :419-428
[2]   Assessing changes in teachers' attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching [J].
Al Salami, Mubarak K. ;
Makela, Carole J. ;
de Miranda, Michael A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2017, 27 (01) :63-88
[3]  
Ames Tyler, 2017, Journal of Technology Education, V28, P19
[4]   Conceptual structure and perspectives on entrepreneurship education research: A bibliometric review [J].
Aparicio, Gloria ;
Iturralde, Txomin ;
Maseda, Amaia .
EUROPEAN RESEARCH ON MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2019, 25 (03) :105-113
[5]   Bringing Engineering Design into High School Science Classrooms: The Heating/Cooling Unit [J].
Apedoe, Xornam S. ;
Reynolds, Birdy ;
Ellefson, Michelle R. ;
Schunn, Christian D. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 17 (05) :454-465
[6]   Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners [J].
Atman, Cynthia J. ;
Adams, Robin S. ;
Cardella, Monica E. ;
Turns, Jennifer ;
Mosborg, Susan ;
Saleem, Jason .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (04) :359-379
[7]   Summary of Developments in the Civil Engineering Capstone Course at Purdue University [J].
Barry, Brock E. ;
Drnevich, Vincent P. ;
Irfanoglu, Ayhan ;
Bullock, Darcy .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2012, 138 (01) :95-98
[8]   STEM education in the twenty-first century: learning at work-an exploration of design and technology teacher perceptions and practices [J].
Bell, Dawne ;
Morrison-Love, David ;
Wooff, David ;
McLain, Matt .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2018, 28 (03) :721-737
[9]  
Bilican K, 2020, KEY POINTS STEM EARL
[10]   Integrating science and engineering practices: outcomes from a collaborative professional development [J].
Brand, Brenda R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION, 2020, 7 (01)