Validation of the Bangla WHO-5 Well-being Index

被引:28
作者
Faruk, Md. Omar [1 ]
Alam, Farzana [2 ]
Chowdhury, Kamal Uddin Ahmed [2 ]
Soron, Tanjir Rashid [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Disabil Dev CDD, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[2] Dhaka Univ, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[3] Telepsychiat Res & Innovat Network, Telepsychiatry Innovat Lab, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Bangla; factor structure; reliability; validity; WHO-5; Well-being; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; SELF-CONCEPT; DEPRESSION; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; QUALITY; VERSION; TYPE-1; SCALE; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1017/gmh.2021.26
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background. Subjective wellbeing in terms of objective outcome can be useful to determine the level of progress in clinical practice as well as research studies in Bangladesh. Besides, cultural understanding of well-being for Bangladeshi population is also equally important to report. A valid Bangla version of the five-item WHO Well-being Index can be a suitable measure to achieve the purposes. Therefore, the present study aimed at validating the WHO-5 Well-being Index for general population in Bangladesh. Methods. After following the standard procedures for translation, back-translation, and committee translation, the initial Bangla version of the scale was developed and pretested. Based on the feedback during pretesting, a slight modification was made and the final version was developed. This final version was administered to 269 participants of different socioeconomic backgrounds to find out the reliability and validity of the scale from March 2019 to May 2019. The data analysis was conducted using SPSS 24. Results. The scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (alpha = 0.754) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.713), divergent validity (r = -0.443, p < 0.01 with the Bangla version of Perceived Stress Scale-10) and convergent validity (r = 0.542, p < 0.01 with the Bangla version of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale). The data also yielded one-factor structure for the scale in exploratory factor analysis explaining 38.68% of total variance. The factor-structure was further supported in the confirmatory factor analysis (chi(2) = 295.852, chi(2)/df = 2.017, RMSEA = 0.062, CFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.964, and SRMR = 0.0255). Conclusion. The findings suggested the Bangla version of the WHO-5 Well-being Index is a psychometrically valid and reliable tool for general adult population in Bangladeshi when it comes to measuring subjective well-being both in clinical practice and research studies.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Social measurement: Current issues
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INTERITEM CORRELATIO, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1493
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119409137.CH4
[4]  
Arbuckle J.L., 2011, AMOS 20 .0 User's Guide
[5]  
Arbuckle J.L., 2009, Amos 18
[6]  
Awang Z., 2012, A Handbook on SEM Structural Equation Modelling: SEM Using AMOS Graphic, V5th
[7]   Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index in the context of detecting depression in diabetic patients [J].
Awata, Shuichi ;
Bech, Per ;
Yoshida, Sumiko ;
Hirai, Masashi ;
Suzuki, Susumu ;
Yamashita, Motoyasu ;
Ohara, Arihisa ;
Hinokio, Yoshinori ;
Matsuoka, Hiroo ;
Oka, Yoshitomo .
PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2007, 61 (01) :112-119
[8]   A GUIDE FOR INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
BENSON, J ;
CLARK, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1982, 36 (12) :789-800
[9]  
Browne M. W., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[10]  
Child D., 2006, The Essentials of Factor Analysis, V3rd