Article-processing charges as a barrier for science in low-to-medium income regions

被引:18
作者
Rodrigues, Marcio L. [1 ,2 ]
Savino, Wilson [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Goldenberg, Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Inst Carlos Chagas, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Microbiol Paulo de Goes, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Lab Pesquisas Timo, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[4] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Inst Nacl Ciencia & Tecnol Neuroimunomodulacao, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[5] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rede FAPERJ Pesquisa Neuroinflamacao, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
MEMORIAS DO INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ | 2022年 / 117卷
关键词
author processing charges; open access; low-to-medium income countries;
D O I
10.1590/0074-02760220064
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
It is widely accepted that science is universal by nature. However, to make science universal, access to research findings is imperative. The open access model of publication of academic articles was established and consolidated during the last two decades. However, most of the open access journals apply article-processing charges (APCs), which can cost more than USD 10,000.00. In regions where support for research is scarce, these funds are usually not available. Similar problems occur in countries with weak economies and, consequently, unfavorable currency conversion rates. This situation reveals a barrier to the alleged universality of science and the access to research findings. In this manuscript, the barriers faced by authors and institutions from low-to-middle income regions to cover APCs and make their science freely available are discussed and illustrated with recent numbers.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance [J].
Casadevall, Arturo ;
Fang, Ferric C. .
MBIO, 2015, 6 (05)
[2]  
CNPq-Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, 2021, CHAMADA CNPQ MCTI FN
[3]  
Creative commons, 2022, CREAT COMM LIC
[4]  
DORA, 2012, Technical Report
[5]   The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline? [J].
Ferreira, Catarina ;
Bastille-Rousseau, Guillaume ;
Bennett, Amanda M. ;
Ellington, E. Hance ;
Terwissen, Christine ;
Austin, Cayla ;
Borlestean, Adrian ;
Boudreau, Melanie R. ;
Chan, Kevin ;
Forsythe, Adrian ;
Hossie, Thomas J. ;
Landolt, Kristen ;
Longhi, Jessica ;
Otis, Josee-Anne ;
Peers, Michael J. L. ;
Rae, Jason ;
Seguin, Jacob ;
Watt, Cristen ;
Wehtje, Morgan ;
Murray, Dennis L. .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2016, 91 (03) :597-610
[6]  
Goldenberg S, 2022, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V116
[7]  
Khoo Shaun Yon-Seng, 2019, LIBER Quarterly, V29, DOI 10.18352/lq.10280
[8]  
Kowaltowski A, 2021, PUSH OPEN ACCESS IS
[9]  
Kowaltowski A, 2022, OPEN ACCESS IS CLOSE
[10]  
Kowaltowski A, 2022, NATURE, V603, P793, DOI [10.1038/d41586-022-00865-2, 10.1038/d41586-022-00864-3]