Closer kinships: Rortyan resources for animal rights

被引:3
作者
Abbey, Ruth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Polit Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
Richard Rorty; animal rights; animal ethics; solidarity; cruelty; liberalism; CRUELTY;
D O I
10.1057/cpt.2016.10
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article considers the extent to which the debate about animal rights can be enriched by Richard Rorty's theory of rights. Although Rorty's work has enjoyed a lot of scholarly attention, commentators have not considered the implications of his arguments for animals. Nor have theorists of animal rights engaged his approach to rights. This article argues that Rorty's thinking holds a number of attractions for proponents of animal rights. It also considers some of its drawbacks. It is further argued that Rorty's thinking about rights avoids many of the problems that animal ethic-of-care theorists have found in rights discourse being applied to animals. Rorty's work thus provides a valuable resource for bringing these two major strands within the animal ethics literature into closer theoretical kinship.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] RAWLSIAN RESOURCES FOR ANIMAL ETHICS
    Abbey, Ruth
    [J]. ETHICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 12 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [2] Andrews K., 2014, Empathy and Morality, P193
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, Richard Rorty: Pragmatism and Political Liberalism
  • [4] [Anonymous], NY TIMES MAGAZINE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, The Age of Empathy: Nature's Lessons for a Kinder Society, DOI DOI 10.1080/03057240.2011.541776
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2013, R RORTY
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, BETTER ANGELS OUR NA
  • [8] Bacon Michael, 2011, POLITICAL PHILOS 20, P198
  • [9] Bailey Cathryn., 2007, FEMINIST CARE TRADIT, P344
  • [10] Rorty and human rights Contingency, emotions and how to defend human rights telling stories
    Barreto, Jose-Manuel
    [J]. UTRECHT LAW REVIEW, 2011, 7 (02): : 93 - 112