Reproducibility and repeatability of same-day two sequential FDG PET/MR and PET/CT

被引:12
作者
Groshar, David [1 ,2 ]
Bernstine, Hanna [1 ,2 ]
Goldberg, Natalia [1 ]
Nidam, Meital [1 ]
Stein, Dan [1 ]
Abadi-Korek, Ifat [1 ]
Domachevsky, Liran [1 ]
机构
[1] Assuta Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, 20 Habarzel St, IL-6971028 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
CANCER IMAGING | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
PET/MR; SUV; Reproducibility; Repeatability; Reliability; CELL LUNG-CANCER; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; VOLUME MEASUREMENTS; LESION DETECTION; F-18-FDG PET/MR; QUANTIFICATION; QUANTITATION; PERFORMANCE; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1186/s40644-017-0113-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To determine PET/CT and PET/MR reproducibility and PET/MR repeatability of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake measurements in tumors in cancer patients. Methods: This IRB approved prospective study was performed between October 2015 and February 2016 in consecutive patients who performed same day PET/CT and two sequential PET/MR. Thirty three patients with visible tumors (N=63) were included. SUV for body weight (SUV) and lean body mass (SUL) were obtained. Volume of interest (VOI) with a threshold of 40% was used and SUV/L's, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and tumor to liver ratio (T/L) were calculated. Measurements were plotted in a scattered diagram to visually identify correlation, a regression line was drawn and the equation of the line was calculated. Bland-Altman plots expressed as percentages were constructed to assess the agreement between measurements. The maximal clinically acceptable limits range was defined as +/- 30%. Results: Lesional SUV's, SUL's and MTV corrected to body weight (BW) and lean body mass (LBM) demonstrated strong positive linear correlation between PET/CT and PET/MR and between two sequential PET/MR. The 95% limits of agreement ranged from -27.7 to 17.5 with a mean of -5.1 and -27.6 to 17.9 with a mean of -4.9 for SUVpeak and SULpeak, respectively for sequential PET/MR. Other PET metrics demonstrated limits range that is above +/- 30% between PET/CT and PET/MR and between two sequential PET/MR. Conclusion: PET/MR SUV/L peak has a clinically acceptable repeatability performance and can be used to evaluate the response to treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: Lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues
    Pace, Leonardo
    Nicolai, Emanuele
    Luongo, Angelo
    Aiello, Marco
    Catalano, Onofrio A.
    Soricelli, Andrea
    Salvatore, Marco
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) : 289 - 296
  • [12] Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Hybrid Imaging Clinical Experience
    Quick, Harald H.
    von Gall, Carl
    Zeilinger, Martin
    Wiesmueller, Marco
    Braun, Harald
    Ziegler, Susanne
    Kuwert, Torsten
    Uder, Michael
    Doerfler, Arnd
    Kalender, Willi A.
    Lell, Michael
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (05) : 280 - 289
  • [13] Reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET uptake measurements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on both PET/CT and PET/MR
    Rasmussen, J. H.
    Fischer, B. M.
    Aznar, M. C.
    Hansen, A. E.
    Vogelius, I. R.
    Lofgren, J.
    Andersen, F. L.
    Loft, A.
    Kjaer, A.
    Hojgaard, L.
    Specht, L.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1048)
  • [14] Ripa RS, 2013, AM J NUCL MED MOLEC, V3, P361
  • [15] Pulmonary Lesion Assessment: Comparison of Whole-Body Hybrid MR/PET and PET/CT Imaging-Pilot Study
    Schwenzer, Nina F.
    Schraml, Christina
    Mueller, Mark
    Brendle, Cornelia
    Sauter, Alexander
    Spengler, Werner
    Pfannenberg, Anna C.
    Claussen, Claus D.
    Schmidt, Holger
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 264 (02) : 551 - 558
  • [16] Effect of Attenuation Correction on Regional Quantification Between PET/MR and PET/CT: A Multicenter Study Using a 3-Dimensional Brain Phantom
    Teuho, Jarmo
    Johansson, Jarkko
    Linden, Jani
    Hansen, Adam Espe
    Holm, Soren
    Keller, Sune H.
    Delso, Gaspar
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    Magota, Keiichi
    Saunavaara, Virva
    Tolvanen, Tuula
    Teras, Mika
    Iida, Hidehiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (05) : 818 - 824
  • [17] Does the Novel Integrated PET/MRI Offer the Same Diagnostic Performance as PET/CT for Oncological Indications?
    Tian, Jiahe
    Fu, Liping
    Yin, Dayi
    Zhang, Jinming
    Chen, Yingmao
    An, Ningyu
    Xu, Baixuan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [18] Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and neck tumours: 18F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT
    Varoquaux, Arthur
    Rager, Olivier
    Poncet, Antoine
    Delattre, Benedicte M. A.
    Ratib, Osman
    Becker, Christoph D.
    Dulguerov, Pavel
    Dulguerov, Nicolas
    Zaidi, Habib
    Becker, Minerva
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 (03) : 462 - 475
  • [19] From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors
    Wahl, Richard L.
    Jacene, Heather
    Kasamon, Yvette
    Lodge, Martin A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 : 122S - 150S
  • [20] Comparison of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake between PET from a simultaneously acquiring whole-body PET/MR hybrid scanner and PET from PET/CT
    Wiesmueller, Marco
    Quick, Harald H.
    Navalpakkam, Bharath
    Lell, Michael M.
    Uder, Michael
    Ritt, Philipp
    Schmidt, Daniela
    Beck, Michael
    Kuwert, Torsten
    von Gall, Carl C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 (01) : 12 - 21