Ecological connectivity research in urban areas

被引:179
作者
LaPoint, Scott [1 ,2 ]
Balkenhol, Niko [3 ]
Hale, James [4 ]
Sadler, Jonathan [4 ]
van der Ree, Rodney [5 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Ornithol, D-78315 Radolfzell am Bodensee, Germany
[2] Univ Konstanz, Dept Biol, D-78464 Constance, Germany
[3] Univ Gottingen, Dept Wildlife Sci, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Melbourne, Australian Res Ctr Urban Ecol, Royal Bot Gardens Victoria, Sch BioSci, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
barrier; biodiversity; conservation; corridor; ecology; fragmentation; gene flow; movement; structure; wildlife; GENE FLOW; LANDSCAPE GENETICS; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH; GRADIENT ANALYSIS; MOVEMENT ECOLOGY; URBANIZATION; DISPERSAL; PERMEABILITY; MELBOURNE; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2435.12489
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. The successful movement of individuals is fundamental to life. Facilitating these movements by promoting ecological connectivity has become a central theme in ecology and conservation. Urban areas contain more than half of the world's human population, and their potential to support biodiversity and to connect their citizens to nature is increasingly recognized. Promoting ecological connectivity within these areas is essential to reaching this potential. However, our current understanding of ecological connectivity within urban areas appears limited. 2. We reviewed the published scientific literature to assess the state-of-the-art of ecological connectivity research in urban areas, summarized trends in study attributes and highlighted knowledge gaps. 3. We found 174 papers that investigated ecological connectivity within urban areas. These papers addressed either structural (48) or functional connectivity (111), and some addressed both (15), but contained substantial geographic and taxonomic biases. These papers rarely defined the aspect of connectivity they were investigating and objective descriptions of the local urban context were uncommon. Formulated hypotheses or a priori predictions were typically unstated and many papers used suboptimal study designs and methods. 4. We suggest future studies explicitly consider and quantify the landscape within their analyses and make greater use of available and rapidly developing tools and methods for measuring functional connectivity (e.g. biotelemetry or landscape genetics). We also highlight the need for studies to clearly define how the terms 'urban' and 'connectivity' have been applied. 5. Knowledge gaps in ecological connectivity in urban areas remain, partly because the field is still in its infancy and partly because we must better capitalize on the state-of-the-art technological and analytical techniques that are increasingly available. Well-designed studies that employed high-resolution data and powerful analytical techniques highlight our abilities to quantify ecological connectivity in urban areas. These studies are exemplary, setting the standards for future research to facilitate data-driven and evidence-based biodiversity-friendly infrastructure planning in urban areas.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 878
页数:11
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model [J].
Adriaensen, F ;
Chardon, JP ;
De Blust, G ;
Swinnen, E ;
Villalba, S ;
Gulinck, H ;
Matthysen, E .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2003, 64 (04) :233-247
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, STAT WORLDS CIT 2012
[3]   A simulation-based evaluation of methods for inferring linear barriers to gene flow [J].
Blair, Christopher ;
Weigel, Dana E. ;
Balazik, Matthew ;
Keeley, Annika T. H. ;
Walker, Faith M. ;
Landguth, Erin ;
Cushman, Sam ;
Murphy, Melanie ;
Waits, Lisette ;
Balkenhol, Niko .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2012, 12 (05) :822-833
[4]   Costs of dispersal [J].
Bonte, Dries ;
Van Dyck, Hans ;
Bullock, James M. ;
Coulon, Aurelie ;
Delgado, Maria ;
Gibbs, Melanie ;
Lehouck, Valerie ;
Matthysen, Erik ;
Mustin, Karin ;
Saastamoinen, Marjo ;
Schtickzelle, Nicolas ;
Stevens, Virginie M. ;
Vandewoestijne, Sofie ;
Baguette, Michel ;
Barton, Kamil ;
Benton, Tim G. ;
Chaput-Bardy, Audrey ;
Clobert, Jean ;
Dytham, Calvin ;
Hovestadt, Thomas ;
Meier, Christoph M. ;
Palmer, Steve C. F. ;
Turlure, Camille ;
Travis, Justin M. J. .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2012, 87 (02) :290-312
[5]   Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases [J].
Bradley, Catherine A. ;
Altizer, Sonia .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (02) :95-102
[6]   Technology on the Move: Recent and Forthcoming Innovations for Tracking Migratory Birds [J].
Bridge, Eli S. ;
Thorup, Kasper ;
Bowlin, Melissa S. ;
Chilson, Phillip B. ;
Diehl, Robert H. ;
Fleron, Rene W. ;
Hartl, Phillip ;
Kays, Roland ;
Kelly, Jeffrey F. ;
Robinson, W. Douglas ;
Wikelski, Martin .
BIOSCIENCE, 2011, 61 (09) :689-698
[7]   Accelerometer-Informed GPS Telemetry: Reducing the Trade-Off Between Resolution and Longevity [J].
Brown, Danielle D. ;
Lapoint, Scott ;
Kays, Roland ;
Heidrich, Wolfgang ;
Kuemmeth, Franz ;
Wikelski, Martin .
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2012, 36 (01) :139-146
[8]  
Brown JoelS., 2007, Foraging: Behavior and Ecology
[9]  
Cadenasso ML, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P80, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[80:SHIUER]2.0.CO
[10]  
2