Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves

被引:365
|
作者
Vile, D
Garnier, É
Shipley, B
Laurent, G
Navas, ML
Roumet, C
Lavorel, S
Díaz, S
Hodgson, JG
Lloret, F
Midgley, GF
Poorter, H
Rutherford, MC
Wilson, PJ
Wright, IJ
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, CNRS, UMR 5175, F-34293 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Biol, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[3] Univ Grenoble 1, Lab Ecol Alpine, CNRS, UMR 5553, F-38041 Grenoble, France
[4] Ecole Natl Super Agron Montpellier, Dept Sci Protect Plantes & Ecol, F-34060 Montpellier, France
[5] Univ Nacl Cordoba, CONICET, Inst Multidisciplinario Biol Vegetal, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
[6] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Fac Ciencias Exactas Fis & Nat, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
[7] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Unit Comparat Plant Ecol, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[8] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Ctr Recerca Ecol Aplicac Forestals, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[9] Natl Bot Inst, Kirstenbosch Res Ctr, ZA-7735 Cape Town, South Africa
[10] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[11] Macquarie Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
leaf thickness; specific leaf area; leaf dry matter content; leaf density; interspecific variation; global comparative analysis;
D O I
10.1093/aob/mci264
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Background and Aims Leaf thickness plays an important role in leaf and plant functioning, and relates to a species' strategy of resource acquisition and use. As such, it has been widely used for screening purposes in crop science and community ecology. However, since its measurement is not straightforward, a number of estimates have been proposed. Here, the validity of the (SLA x LDMC)(-1) product is tested to estimate leaf thickness, where SLA is the specific leaf area (leaf area/dry mass) and LDMC is the leaf dry matter content (leaf dry mass/fresh mass). SLA and LDMC are two leaf traits that are both more easily measurable and often reported in the literature. Methods The relationship between leaf thickness (LT) and (SLA x LDMC)(-1) was tested in two analyses of covariance using 11 datasets (three original and eight published) for a total number of 1039 data points, corresponding to a wide range of growth forms growing in contrasted environments in four continents. Key Results and Conclusions The overall slope and intercept of the relationship were not significantly different from one and zero, respectively, and the residual standard error was 0.11. Only two of the eight datasets displayed a significant difference in the intercepts, and the only significant difference among the most represented growth forms was for trees. LT can therefore be estimated by (SLA x LDMC)(-1), allowing leaf thickness to be derived from easily and widely measured leaf traits.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1136
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条