Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves

被引:365
|
作者
Vile, D
Garnier, É
Shipley, B
Laurent, G
Navas, ML
Roumet, C
Lavorel, S
Díaz, S
Hodgson, JG
Lloret, F
Midgley, GF
Poorter, H
Rutherford, MC
Wilson, PJ
Wright, IJ
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, CNRS, UMR 5175, F-34293 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Biol, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[3] Univ Grenoble 1, Lab Ecol Alpine, CNRS, UMR 5553, F-38041 Grenoble, France
[4] Ecole Natl Super Agron Montpellier, Dept Sci Protect Plantes & Ecol, F-34060 Montpellier, France
[5] Univ Nacl Cordoba, CONICET, Inst Multidisciplinario Biol Vegetal, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
[6] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Fac Ciencias Exactas Fis & Nat, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
[7] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Unit Comparat Plant Ecol, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[8] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Ctr Recerca Ecol Aplicac Forestals, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[9] Natl Bot Inst, Kirstenbosch Res Ctr, ZA-7735 Cape Town, South Africa
[10] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[11] Macquarie Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
leaf thickness; specific leaf area; leaf dry matter content; leaf density; interspecific variation; global comparative analysis;
D O I
10.1093/aob/mci264
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Background and Aims Leaf thickness plays an important role in leaf and plant functioning, and relates to a species' strategy of resource acquisition and use. As such, it has been widely used for screening purposes in crop science and community ecology. However, since its measurement is not straightforward, a number of estimates have been proposed. Here, the validity of the (SLA x LDMC)(-1) product is tested to estimate leaf thickness, where SLA is the specific leaf area (leaf area/dry mass) and LDMC is the leaf dry matter content (leaf dry mass/fresh mass). SLA and LDMC are two leaf traits that are both more easily measurable and often reported in the literature. Methods The relationship between leaf thickness (LT) and (SLA x LDMC)(-1) was tested in two analyses of covariance using 11 datasets (three original and eight published) for a total number of 1039 data points, corresponding to a wide range of growth forms growing in contrasted environments in four continents. Key Results and Conclusions The overall slope and intercept of the relationship were not significantly different from one and zero, respectively, and the residual standard error was 0.11. Only two of the eight datasets displayed a significant difference in the intercepts, and the only significant difference among the most represented growth forms was for trees. LT can therefore be estimated by (SLA x LDMC)(-1), allowing leaf thickness to be derived from easily and widely measured leaf traits.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1136
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content
    Garnier, E
    Shipley, B
    Roumet, C
    Laurent, G
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) : 688 - 695
  • [2] Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content of plants growing in sand dunes
    Li, YL
    Johnson, DA
    Su, YZ
    Cui, JY
    Zhang, TH
    BOTANICAL BULLETIN OF ACADEMIA SINICA, 2005, 46 (02): : 127 - 134
  • [3] PROSPECT INVERSION FOR INDIRECT ESTIMATION OF LEAF DRY MATTER CONTENT AND SPECIFIC LEAF AREA
    Ali, Abebe Mohammed
    Darvishzadeh, Roshanak
    Skidmore, Andrew K.
    van Duren, Iris
    Heiden, Uta
    Heurich, Marco
    36TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 47 (W3): : 277 - 284
  • [4] Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies
    Wilson, PJ
    Thompson, K
    Hodgson, JG
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1999, 143 (01) : 155 - 162
  • [5] Is leaf dry matter content a better predictor of soil fertility than specific leaf area?
    Hodgson, J. G.
    Montserrat-Marti, G.
    Charles, M.
    Jones, G.
    Wilson, P.
    Shipley, B.
    Sharafi, M.
    Cerabolini, B. E. L.
    Cornelissen, J. H. C.
    Band, S. R.
    Bogard, A.
    Castro-Diez, P.
    Guerrero-Campo, J.
    Palmer, C.
    Perez-Rontome, M. C.
    Carter, G.
    Hynd, A.
    Romo-Diez, A.
    de Torres Espuny, L.
    Royo Pla, F.
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2011, 108 (07) : 1337 - 1345
  • [6] Modelling to Estimate the Specific Leaf Area of Tomato Leaves ('Pannovy')
    Dannehl, D.
    Rocksch, T.
    Schmidt, U.
    II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HORTICULTURE IN EUROPE, 2015, 1099 : 79 - 86
  • [7] Estimating leaf functional traits by inversion of PROSPECT: Assessing leaf dry matter content and specific leaf area in mixed mountainous forest
    Ali, Abebe Mohammed
    Darvishzadeh, Roshanak
    Skidmore, Andrew K.
    van Duren, Iris
    Heiden, Uta
    Heurich, Marco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2016, 45 : 66 - 76
  • [8] Simulation of leaf area development based on dry matter partitioning and specific leaf area for cut chrysanthemum
    Lee, JH
    Heuvelink, E
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2003, 91 (03) : 319 - 327
  • [9] Effects of Canopy Structural Variables on Retrieval of Leaf Dry Matter Content and Specific Leaf Area From Remotely Sensed Data
    Ali, Abebe Mohammed
    Darvishzadeh, Roshanak
    Skidmore, Andrew K.
    van Duren, Iris
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 9 (02) : 898 - 909
  • [10] Leaf dry matter content is better at predicting above-ground net primary production than specific leaf area
    Smart, Simon Mark
    Glanville, Helen Catherine
    Blanes, Maria del Carmen
    Mercado, Lina Maria
    Emmett, Bridget Anne
    Jones, David Leonard
    Cosby, Bernard Jackson
    Marrs, Robert Hunter
    Butler, Adam
    Marshall, Miles Ramsvik
    Reinsch, Sabine
    Herrero-Jauregui, Cristina
    Hodgson, John Gavin
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 31 (06) : 1336 - 1344