Sea ice type classification based on random forest machine learning with Cryosat-2 altimeter data

被引:0
作者
Shen, Xiao-yi [1 ]
Zhang, Jie [2 ]
Meng, Jun-min [2 ]
Zhang, Jie [2 ]
Ke, Chang-qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Geog Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr South China Sea Studies, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] State Ocean Adm, Inst Oceanog 1, Qingdao, Peoples R China
来源
2017 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON REMOTE SENSING WITH INTELLIGENT PROCESSING (RSIP 2017) | 2017年
关键词
sea ice type; classification; random forest; Cryosat-2; waveform; RADAR ALTIMETER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Sea ice type is the most sensitive variables in Arctic ice monitoring and its detailed information is essential for ice situation evaluation, climate prediction and vessels navigating. In this study, we analyzed the different sea ice types with the Cryosat-2 (CS-2) SAR mode waveform data. The waveform of CS-2 data was describe by a set of parameters: pulse peakiness (PP), leading-edge width (LeW), trailing-edge width (TeW), stack standard deviation (SSD) and Maximum value of the echo waveform (Max)] and backscatter coefficient (Sigma0). Random forest (RF) classifier was chosen to classify ice type and the classification results were compared with Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) operational ice charts. The results show that 85% of the Arctic surface type can be correctly classified from November 2015 to May 2016, 83% of the FYI can be correctly identified which is the domain ice type in Arctic. In comparison with Bayesian and K nearest-neighbor classifiers, the classification accuracy of RF increased by 5% and 3% respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] BROWN GS, 1977, IEEE T ANTENN PROPAG, V25, P67, DOI 10.1109/JOE.1977.1145328
  • [3] Random Forest and Rotation Forest for fully polarized SAR image classification using polarimetric and spatial features
    Du, Peijun
    Samat, Alim
    Waske, Bjoern
    Liu, Sicong
    Li, Zhenhong
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 105 : 38 - 53
  • [4] Fernández-Delgado M, 2014, J MACH LEARN RES, V15, P3133
  • [5] ICESat observations of Arctic sea ice: A first look
    Kwok, R
    Zwally, HJ
    Yi, DH
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (16) : L164011 - 5
  • [6] High interannual variability of sea ice thickness in the Arctic region
    Laxon, S
    Peacock, N
    Smith, D
    [J]. NATURE, 2003, 425 (6961) : 947 - 950
  • [7] ENVISAT radar altimeter measurements over continental surfaces and ice caps using the ICE-2 retracking algorithm
    Legresy, B
    Papa, F
    Remy, F
    Vinay, G
    van den Bosch, M
    Zanife, OZ
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 95 (02) : 150 - 163
  • [8] Mahoney A. R., 2008, J GEOPHYS RES, V113, P303
  • [9] A younger, thinner Arctic ice cover: Increased potential for rapid, extensive sea-ice loss
    Maslanik, J. A.
    Fowler, C.
    Stroeve, J.
    Drobot, S.
    Zwally, J.
    Yi, D.
    Emery, W.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (24)
  • [10] Utilisation of CryoSat-2 SAR altimeter in operational ice charting
    Rinne, E.
    Simila, M.
    [J]. CRYOSPHERE, 2016, 10 (01) : 121 - 131