Organic carbon storage in soils of tropical and subtropical China

被引:22
|
作者
Li, Z [1 ]
Jiang, X [1 ]
Pan, XZ [1 ]
Zhao, QG [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sinica, Inst Soil Sci, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
来源
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION | 2001年 / 129卷 / 1-4期
关键词
C density; C storage; soil; tropical and subtropical China;
D O I
10.1023/A:1010356828990
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tropical and subtropical China occupies a total area of about 215 Mha, but the contents and storage of soil organic carbon (C) on this land have not been well studied. This research was conducted in this concern by jointly using soil survey data and the regional soil map. It was estimated that the 0-20 cm C density of the soil subgroups in the region varied from 1.2 to 9.7 kg C m(-2). In the major zonal soils, soil subgroup 'young similar to' had generally a C density about 1.2-4.4 times lower than its other natural counterparts. Furthermore, subgroups of the cultivated soil gave a C density about 20-63% lower than their natural counterparts (except subgroup 'young similar to'), showing remarkable C losses caused by cultivation. For soil groups in the east, brown soil had the highest C density (6.8 and 21.4 kg C m(-2), for the upper 20 and 100 cm soil, respectively), followed by yellow soil, yellow brown soil and limestone soil (4.6-5.5 and 12.3-14.5 kg C m(-2), idem). Torrid red soil, purplish soil and fluvo-aquic soil had the lowest C density (2.0-2.2 and 5.8-7.5 kg C m(-2), idem) with the others ranking at a medium level. In the west, podzolic soil ranked the highest (17.9 and 55.8 kg C m(-2), idem), followed by dark brown soil, brown soil and limestone soil (6.9-11.6 and 21-29 kg C m(-2), idem), and again torrid red soil, purplish soil and fluvo-aquic soil ranked the lowest (3.9-5.1 and 11.4-14.1 kg C m(-2), idem). Finally, a total of about 26.8 +/-7.4 Pg organic C was estimated being stored in soils of the entire region.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 60
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Organic carbon storage in floodplain soils of the US prairies
    Wohl, E.
    Pfeiffer, A.
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 34 (05) : 406 - 416
  • [32] Storage of organic carbon in the soils of Mexican temperate forests
    Santini, Nadia S.
    Adame, Maria Fernanda
    Nolan, Rachael H.
    Miquelajauregui, Yosune
    Pinero, Daniel
    Mastretta-Yanes, Alicia
    Cuervo-Robayo, Angela P.
    Eamus, Derek
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 446 : 115 - 125
  • [33] NITRIFICATION AND NITRIFYING POTENTIAL OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPICAL SOILS
    CHAO, WL
    GAN, KD
    CHAO, CC
    BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1993, 15 (02) : 87 - 90
  • [34] Organic C and N mineralization as affected by dissolved organic matter in paddy soils of subtropical China
    Li, Z. P.
    Han, C. W.
    Han, F. X.
    GEODERMA, 2010, 157 (3-4) : 206 - 213
  • [35] Soil organic carbon pools of two tropical soils inferred by carbon signatures
    Hsieh, YP
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1996, 60 (04) : 1117 - 1121
  • [36] Important constraints on soil organic carbon formation efficiency in subtropical and tropical grasslands
    Mitchell, Elaine
    Scheer, Clemens
    Rowlings, David
    Cotrufo, Francesca
    Conant, Richard T.
    Grace, Peter
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (20) : 5383 - 5391
  • [37] Distribution of organic carbon and lignin in soils in a subtropical small mountainous river basin
    Bao, Hongyan
    Kao, Shuh-Ji
    Lee, Tsung-Yu
    Zehetner, Franz
    Huang, Jr-Chuan
    Chang, Yuan-Pin
    Lu, Jung-Tai
    Lee, Jun-Yi
    GEODERMA, 2017, 306 : 81 - 88
  • [38] Distribution and storage of soil organic carbon in China
    Wu, HB
    Guo, ZT
    Peng, CH
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2003, 17 (02)
  • [39] Comparative Study of Carbon Storage in Different Forest Stands in Subtropical China
    Pekun Jiang
    Cifu Meng
    Guomo Zhou
    Qiufang Xu
    The Botanical Review, 2011, 77 : 242 - 251
  • [40] Comparative Study of Carbon Storage in Different Forest Stands in Subtropical China
    Jiang, Pekun
    Meng, Cifu
    Zhou, Guomo
    Xu, Qiufang
    BOTANICAL REVIEW, 2011, 77 (03): : 242 - 251