Fremanezumab as Add-On Treatment for Patients Treated With Other Migraine Preventive Medicines

被引:38
|
作者
Cohen, Joshua M. [1 ]
Dodick, David W. [2 ]
Yang, Ronghua [3 ]
Newman, Lawrence C. [4 ]
Li, Thomas [3 ]
Aycardi, Ernesto [5 ]
Bigal, Marcelo E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Teva Pharmaceut Ind, Med Affairs, Frazer, PA USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Teva Pharmaceut Ind, Biostat, Frazer, PA USA
[4] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[5] Teva Pharmaceut Ind, Clin Dev, 41 Moores Rd, Malvern, PA 19355 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2017年 / 57卷 / 09期
关键词
migraine; fremanezumab; TEV-48125; calcitonin-gene-related peptide; migraine preventive medication; QUALITY STANDARDS SUBCOMMITTEE; EPISODIC MIGRAINE; PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT; HEADACHE SOCIETY; AMERICAN ACADEMY; DOUBLE-BLIND; GUIDELINES; PREVALENCE; TEV-48125; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/head.13156
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundFremanezumab (formerly TEV-48125) is a monoclonal antibody directed against calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP), a validated target for migraine preventive therapy. In two previous phase 2 studies, fremanezumab administered once every 28 days for 12 weeks was found to be effective and safe as a preventive treatment for patients suffering from episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab as an add-on preventive therapy in individuals with EM and CM who are on stable doses of preventive migraine medications. MethodsTwo randomized placebo-controlled studies tested once-monthly subcutaneous injections of various dosing regimens of fremanezumab versus placebo in EM and CM. Headache information was captured daily using an electronic headache diary. For these post hoc analyses, data were pooled from patients who were on stable preventive medications and taking fremanezumab doses of 225 mg or 675/225 mg, or placebo. ResultsThe sample consisted of 133 patients, (67 fremanezumab and 66 placebo). Total reduction in migraine days for the duration of the study was 12.4 for fremanezumab and 7.4 for placebo (P=.0321). There were also decreases in moderate/severe headache days (12.5 vs 7.1, P=.0058), and days using acute medication for headaches relative to placebo (11.6 vs 7.5, P=.0414). Treatment emergent adverse events were generally mild and transient, and no serious adverse events were considered to be treatment-related by the site investigators. ConclusionsThe findings from these post hoc analyses suggest that fremanezumab is a safe and effective add-on treatment for migraine patients being concomitantly treated with other migraine preventive medications. Trials are registered at NCT02025556 and NCT02021773.
引用
收藏
页码:1375 / 1384
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Numbers needed to treat or harm and likelihood of being helped versus harmed for fremanezumab in patients who had prior inadequate response to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications: A post hoc analysis
    Ashina, Messoud
    Mitsikostas, Dimos D.
    Campos, Verena Ramirez
    Barash, Steve
    Ning, Xiaoping
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    HEADACHE, 2023, 63 (10): : 1351 - 1358
  • [22] Impact of acupuncture as add-on therapy to pharmacological treatment of migraine:: A pilot study
    Linde, MA
    Carlsson, JY
    Dahlöf, CG
    PAIN CLINIC, 2000, 12 (03) : 247 - 252
  • [23] Comparison study between erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab in the preventive treatment of high frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine
    Simone Quintana
    Marco Russo
    Gian Camillo Manzoni
    Paola Torelli
    Neurological Sciences, 2022, 43 : 5757 - 5758
  • [24] Comparison study between erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab in the preventive treatment of high frequency episodic migraine and chronic migraine
    Quintana, Simone
    Russo, Marco
    Manzoni, Gian Camillo
    Torelli, Paola
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 43 (09) : 5757 - 5758
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine with documented inadequate response to 2 to 4 classes of migraine preventive medications over 6 months of treatment in the phase 3b FOCUS study
    Ashina, Messoud
    Cohen, Joshua M.
    Galic, Maja
    Campos, Verena Ramirez
    Barash, Steve
    Ning, Xiaoping
    Kessler, Yoel
    Janka, Lindsay
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [26] OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment for chronic migraine: experience in 52 patients treated with the PREEMPT paradigm
    Isabel Pedraza, Maria
    de la Cruz, Carolina
    Ruiz, Marina
    Lopez-Mesonero, Luis
    Martinez, Elena
    de Lera, Mercedes
    Luis Guerrero, Angel
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2015, 4
  • [27] Acceptance of preventive treatment in migraine patients: Results of a survey
    Smelt, Antonia F. H.
    Eijsenga, Simon J.
    Assendelft, Willem J. J.
    Blom, Jeanet W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (03) : 143 - 148
  • [28] Treatment benefit among migraine patients taking fremanezumab: results from a post hoc responder analysis of two placebo-controlled trials
    Silberstein, Stephen D.
    Cohen, Joshua M.
    Yang, Ronghua
    Gandhi, Sanjay K.
    Du, Evelyn
    Jann, Adelene E.
    Marmura, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [29] Cost-Effectiveness of Erenumab for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine in Patients with Prior Treatment Failures in Sweden
    Mahon, Ronan
    Lang, Andrea
    Vo, Pamela
    Huels, Jasper
    Cooney, Philip
    Danyliv, Andriy
    Vudumula, Umakanth
    Vadapalle, Sreelatha
    Maniyar, Farooq
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2021, 39 (03) : 357 - 372
  • [30] Early add-on treatment vs alternative monotherapy in patients with partial epilepsy
    Semah, Franck
    Thomas, Pierre
    Coulbaut, Safia
    Derambure, Philippe
    EPILEPTIC DISORDERS, 2014, 16 (02) : 165 - 174