Bone density studies and the interpretation of the faunal record

被引:65
作者
Lam, YM [1 ]
Pearson, OM
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Anthropol, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
[2] Univ Cape Town, Dept Archaeol, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[3] Iziko S African Museum, Nat Hist Collect Div, Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Univ New Mexico, Dept Anthropol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
来源
EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY | 2005年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
taphonomy; zooarcheology; scavenging; hunting; mortality profiles; skeletal element abundance; species representation;
D O I
10.1002/evan.20053
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Some bones preserve better than others. For decades, researchers have attempted to quantify this observation. While many of their intrinsic qualities are known to affect how well bones preserve in the archeological record,(1) the variable that has received the most attention to date is bone density.(2-6) This has become the most commonly accepted proxy measure of a bone's ability to withstand destructive forces.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 108
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Identifying necessity and sufficiency relationships in skeletal-part representation using fuzzy-set theory [J].
Beaver, JE .
AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, 2004, 69 (01) :131-140
[2]  
BEHRENSMEYER A K, 1975, Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, V146, P473
[3]  
Binford LewisR., 1984, FAUNAL REMAINS KLASI
[4]  
Binford LewisR., 1981, Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths
[5]  
Binford LewisR., 1978, NUNAMIUT ETHNOARCHAE
[6]  
Binford LR., 1977, For theory building in archaeology: essays on faunal remains, aquatic resources, spatial analysis, and systemic modeling, P77
[7]  
Brain C. K., 1969, Scientific Papers Namib Desert Research Station, VNo. 39, P13
[8]  
Brain CK., 1981, HUNTERS HUNTED INTRO
[9]   SYSTEMATIC BUTCHERY BY PLIO PLEISTOCENE HOMINIDS AT OLDUVAI-GORGE, TANZANIA [J].
BUNN, HT ;
KROLL, EM .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 1986, 27 (05) :431-452
[10]   THE ROLE OF BONE-DENSITY IN STRUCTURING PREHISTORIC SALMON BONE ASSEMBLAGES [J].
BUTLER, VL ;
CHATTERS, JC .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 21 (03) :413-424