Environmental Consequences of Future Biogas Technologies Based on Separated Slurry

被引:101
作者
Hamelin, Lorie [1 ]
Wesnaes, Marianne [1 ]
Wenzel, Henrik [1 ]
Petersen, Bjorn M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Denmark, Inst Chem Engn Biotechnol & Environm Technol, Fac Engn, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Fac Agr Sci, Dept Agroecol & Environm, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
关键词
MANURE; EMISSIONS; AMMONIA; METHANE;
D O I
10.1021/es200273j
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This consequential life cycle assessment study highlights the key environmental aspects of producing biogas from separated pig and cow slurry, a relatively new but probable scenario for future biogas production, as it avoids the reliance on constrained carbon cosubstrates. Three scenarios involving different slurry separation technologies have been assessed and compared to a business-as-usual reference slurry management scenario. The results show that the environmental benefits of such biogas production are highly dependent upon the efficiency of the separation technology used to concentrate the volatile solids in the solid fraction. The biogas scenario involving the most efficient separation technology resulted in a dry matter separation efficiency of 87% and allowed a net reduction of the global warming potential of 40%, compared to the reference slurry management. This figure comprises the whole slurry life cycle, including the flows bypassing the biogas plant. This study includes soil carbon balances and a method for quantifying the changes in yield resulting from increased nitrogen availability as well as for quantifying mineral fertilizers displacement. Soil carbon balances showed that between 13 and 50% less carbon ends up in the soil pool with the different biogas alternatives, as opposed to the reference slurry management.
引用
收藏
页码:5869 / 5877
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
*GE EN, GE EN JENB TYP 3
[22]   Evaluating ammonia emission potential from concrete slat designs for pig housing [J].
Hamelin, L. ;
Godbout, S. ;
Theriault, R. ;
Lemay, S. P. .
BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2010, 105 (04) :455-465
[23]   Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Inhibition by ammonia [J].
Hansen, KH ;
Angelidaki, I ;
Ahring, BK .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (01) :5-12
[24]  
*I PROD DEV, 2007, LIF CYCL ASS BIOG MA
[25]  
International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA), PROD TRAD STAT
[26]  
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2006, 140442006 ISO
[27]   IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology [J].
Jolliet, O ;
Margni, M ;
Charles, R ;
Humbert, S ;
Payet, J ;
Rebitzer, G ;
Rosenbaum, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (06) :324-330
[28]   Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA [J].
Lund, Henrik ;
Mathiesen, Brian Vad ;
Christensen, Per ;
Schmidt, Jannick Hoejrup .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (03) :260-271
[29]  
*MIN FOOD AGR FISH, 2008, VEJL GODSKN HARM PLA
[30]   Process performance of biogas digesters incorporating pre-separated manure [J].
Moller, H. B. ;
Nielsen, A. M. ;
Nakakubo, R. ;
Olsen, H. J. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2007, 112 (03) :217-223