Forecasting mining capital cost for open-pit mining projects based on artificial neural network approach

被引:48
作者
Guo, Hongquan [1 ]
Hoang Nguyen [2 ]
Diep-Anh Vu [3 ]
Xuan-Nam Bui [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Resources & Safety Engn, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[3] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Dept Basic Econ, Duc Thang Ward, 18 Vien St, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Min Fac, Dept Surface Min, Duc Thang Ward, 18 Vien St, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Ctr Min, Electromech Res, Duc Thang Ward, 18 Vien St, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
artificial neural network; Artificial intelligence; Mining capital cost; Open-pit mining; Resources policy; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TRADITIONAL OPTIMIZATION; MINE; MODEL; PRICE; VOLATILITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101474
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study considered and developed four artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to estimate mining capital cost (MCC) for open-pit copper mining projects with high accuracy, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and classification and regression tree (CART); 74 observations of mining projects were collected and analyzed to predict MCC based on five input variables. Root-mean-squared error (RMSE), coefficient of correlation (R-2), mean absolute error (MAE), and absolute percentage error (APE), were used to evaluate the performance/quality/accuracy of the models. The results of this study indicated that ANN, RF, SVM and CART models were advanced techniques in predicting MCC with high accuracy. Of those, the ANN model yielded the most dominant accuracy/performance with an RMSE of 138.103, R-2 of 0.990, MAE of 114.589, and APE of 7.770%. The remaining models (i.e. RF, SVM, CART) yielded lower performance with RMSE in the range of 172.975-379.691, R-2 in the range of 0.924-0.987, MAE in the range of 134.982-301.196, and APE in the range of 10.339%-19.384%. The results of the sensitivity analysis of this work also revealed that production capacity includes MineAP and MillAP, were the two most essential parameters on the MCC predictive models. They should be used as the primary input parameters for estimating MCC in actual.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Cutoff grade optimization in open pit mines using genetic algorithm [J].
Ahmadi, Mohammad Reza ;
Shahabi, Reza Shakoor .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2018, 55 :184-191
[2]  
[Anonymous], P FINANCE MINERALS I
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, INT J MIN RECLAM ENV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1980, PARAMETRIC COST ESTI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, IEEE Trans. Broadcast.
[6]  
[Anonymous], 10 ANN C HOUGHT MICH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SME MINING ENG HDB
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1982, MINING MINERAL PROCE
[9]   Cost modelling for flotation machines [J].
Arfania, S. ;
Sayadi, A. R. ;
Khalesi, M. R. .
JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 2017, 117 (01) :89-96
[10]  
Awad M., 2015, Efficient Learning Machines: Theories,Concepts, and Applications for Engineers and System Designers, P67