The impact of related party transactions on firm value in Indonesia: moderating role of good corporate governance

被引:4
作者
Abigail, Anita [1 ]
Dharmastuti, Christiana [1 ]
机构
[1] Atma Jaya Catholic Univ Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
来源
COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT | 2022年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
related party transactions; firm value; good corporate governance; agency theory; FAMILY OWNERSHIP; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; AUDIT COMMITTEE; PERFORMANCE; EXPROPRIATION;
D O I
10.1080/23311975.2022.2135208
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In its business operation, a firm may transact with related parties. From an agency theory point of view, agents may use the transaction to maximize the firm value or for personal gain. This study aims to analyze the effect of Related Party Transactions on Firm Value with Good Corporate Governance as moderating variable, represented by the oversight by the majority shareholder and the size of the audit committee. The majority shareholders are divided into three groups: the state-owned company, the foreign-owned company, and the local privately owned company. The study was done using a quantitative analysis method on 58 public companies on Indonesia Stock Exchange included in the LQ45 Stock Index between 2016-2020. The data is processed with the moderated multiple regression model. The result shows no significant relationship exists between Related Party Transactions on Firm Value. The Detrimental Related Party Transactions only become significant on Firm Value when moderated by the state majority ownership. Meanwhile, the Beneficial Related Party Transactions only become significant on Firm Value when moderated by the foreign majority ownership. This study recommends that state-owned companies strengthen the application of their good corporate governance and execute related party transactions only when it adds to the firm value. Managers of foreign companies are advised not to rely entirely on related party transactions with shareholders or sister companies.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Audit committee adoption and firm value: evidence from UK financial institutions [J].
Agyemang-Mintah, Peter ;
Schadewitz, Hannu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 26 (01) :205-226
[2]   Disclosure quality vis-a-vis disclosure quantity: Does audit committee matter in Omani financial institutions? [J].
Al Lawati, Hidaya ;
Hussainey, Khaled ;
Sagitova, Roza .
REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2021, 57 (02) :557-594
[3]   Related party transactions and earnings management in Jordan: the role of ownership structure [J].
Alhadab, Mohammad ;
Abdullatif, Modar ;
Mansour, Israa .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2020, 18 (03) :505-531
[4]   Corporate governance mechanisms and R&D intensity in OECD courtiers [J].
AlHares, Aws .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2020, 20 (05) :863-885
[5]  
Almaqoushi W., 2017, AUDIT COMMITTEE INDI, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2959718, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2959718]
[6]   The role of audit committees in mitigating earnings management: evidence from Jordan [J].
Almarayeh, Taha ;
Abdullatif, Modar ;
Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING IN EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2022, 12 (05) :882-907
[7]  
AlSagr N., 2018, Asian Economic and Financial Review, V8, P1111
[8]   Ownership types, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures Empirical evidence from a developing country [J].
Alshbili, Ibrahem ;
Elamer, Ahmed A. ;
Beddewela, Eshani .
ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 33 (01) :148-166
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, DIREKSI DAN DEWAN KO
[10]   Corporate governance and bank performance: A joint analysis of the static, selection, and dynamic effects of domestic, foreign, and state ownership [J].
Berger, AN ;
Clarke, GRG ;
Cull, R ;
Klapper, L ;
Udell, GF .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (8-9) :2179-2221