Caretakers' Perspectives on Return Pediatric Emergency Department Visits: A Qualitative Analysis of Focus Groups

被引:14
作者
Augustine, Erin M. [1 ]
Kreling, Barbara A.
Chamberlain, James M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Natl Hlth Syst, Dept Emergency Med, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010 USA
关键词
focus groups; qualitative study; return visits; CHILDREN; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/PEC.0000000000000781
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives Approximately 5% of pediatric patients return to the emergency department (ED) within 72 hours of initial evaluation. The goal of this study was to identify reasons for return visits from the caretaker perspective. Methods Two parent focus groups were conducted in November 2012. Parents were excluded from participation if the return visit was unrelated to the initial visit or the child was asked to return (e.g., wound check). The focus groups were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach. Results A total of 13 parents participated. Children were 10 months to 11 years of age (median, 3.1 years). Primary symptoms and diagnoses were related to respiratory (n = 6); gastrointestinal (n = 2); dermatologic (n = 2); musculoskeletal (n = 2); and ear, nose, throat and mouth diseases (n = 1). Return visits occurred 12 to 50 hours (median, 24 hours) after the initial visit. Reasons for return visits were divided into 4 domains: (1) the caretaker's response to the initial visit (e.g., dissatisfaction with medical staff, medical care, or information provided), (2) the child's illness (e.g., continued, worsening, or concerning symptoms), (3) the nature of the ED itself (e.g., subspecialist availability, convenient hours), and (4) follow-up care (e.g., lack of appointments with primary physicians or subspecialists). Conclusions Several of the reasons parents identify for return visits are within the locus of control of the ED, and several could be addressed by improving regional health care coordination. Surveys based on these themes will quantitate the reasons for return visits and prioritize future strategies to address the perceived need for return visits.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 598
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Return visits to a pediatric emergency department [J].
Alessandrini, EA ;
Lavelle, JM ;
Grenfell, SM ;
Jacobstein, CR ;
Shaw, KN .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2004, 20 (03) :166-171
[2]   Emergency Department Quality: An Analysis of Existing Pediatric Measures [J].
Alessandrini, Evaline ;
Varadarajan, Kartik ;
Alpern, Elizabeth R. ;
Gorelick, Marc H. ;
Shaw, Kathy ;
Ruddy, Richard M. ;
Chamberlain, James M. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 18 (05) :518-525
[3]   Early Pediatric Emergency Department Return Visits: A Prospective Patient-Centric Assessment [J].
Ali, Alliyia B. ;
Place, Rick ;
Howell, John ;
Malubay, Sienna M. .
CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2012, 51 (07) :651-658
[4]   How well do patients obtain short-term follow-up after discharge from the emergency department? [J].
Barlas, D ;
Homan, CS ;
Rakowski, J ;
Houck, M ;
Thode, HC .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 34 (05) :610-614
[5]   Nonurgent use of a pediatric emergency department - A preliminary qualitative study [J].
Chin, NP ;
Goepp, JG ;
Malia, T ;
Harris, L ;
Poordabbagh, A .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2006, 22 (01) :22-27
[6]   A National Depiction of Children With Return Visits to the Emergency Department Within 72 Hours, 2001-2007 [J].
Cho, Christine S. ;
Shapiro, Daniel J. ;
Cabana, Michael D. ;
Maselli, Judy H. ;
Hersh, Adam L. .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2012, 28 (07) :606-610
[7]  
Creswell J. W., 1998, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
[8]  
Creswell JW, 2009, RES DESIGN QUALITATI, P147
[9]   Analysis of pediatric hospitalizations after emergency department release as a quality improvement tool [J].
DePiero, AD ;
Ochsenschlager, DW ;
Chamberlain, JM .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 39 (02) :159-163
[10]   PHYSICIANS' ASSESSMENT OF PEDIATRIC RETURNS TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
Easter, Joshua S. ;
Bachur, Richard .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (03) :682-688