The Influence of Family Physicians Within the South African District Health System: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:17
作者
von Pressentin, Klaus B. [1 ]
Mash, Robert J. [1 ]
Baldwin-Ragaven, Laurel [2 ]
Petrus, Roelf [3 ]
Govender, Indiran [4 ]
Steinberg, Wilhelm Johannes [5 ]
Esterhuizen, Tonya M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Div Family Med & Primary Care, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Clin Med, Dept Family Med, Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Univ Pretoria, Dept Family Med, Pretoria, South Africa
[4] Sefako Makgatho Hlth Sci Univ, Family Med, Pretoria, South Africa
[5] Univ Free State, Family Med, Bloemfontein, South Africa
[6] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Global Hlth, Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care, Biostat Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
physicians; family; primary care physicians; primary health care; cross-sectional studies; public health systems research; patient care team; QUALITY-OF-CARE; BESROUR-PAPERS; GLOBAL HEALTH; MEDICINE; FUTURE; SERIES; STATE;
D O I
10.1370/afm.2133
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Evidence of the influence of family physicians on health care is required to assist managers and policy makers with human resource planning in Africa. The international argument for family physicians derives mainly from research in high-income countries, so this study aimed to evaluate the influence of family physicians on the South African district health system. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional observational study in 7 South African provinces, comparing 15 district hospitals and 15 community health centers (primary care facilities) with family physicians and the same numbers without family physicians. Facilities with and without family physicians were matched on factors such as province, setting, and size. RESULTS Among district hospitals, those with family physicians generally scored better on indicators of health system performance and clinical processes, and they had significantly fewer modifiable factors associated with pediatric mortality (mean, 2.2 vs 4.7, P=.049). In contrast, among community health centers, those with family physicians generally scored more poorly on indicators of health system performance and clinical processes, with significantly poorer mean scores for continuity of care (2.79 vs 3.03; P=.03) and coordination of care (3.05 vs 3.51; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS In this study, having family physicians on staff was associated with better indicators of performance and processes in district hospitals but not in community health centers. The latter was surprising and is inconsistent with the global literature, suggesting that further research is needed on the influence of family physicians at the primary care level.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 36
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, QUAL CAR PAT NAT COR
[2]  
[Anonymous], S AFR FAM PRACT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CONTRIBUTION FAMILY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, HDB DISTR CLIN SPEC
[5]  
[Anonymous], WORLD HLTH REP 2008
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NATL DEV PLAN 2030 O
[7]  
[Anonymous], L1 L2 L3 AC HOSP PAC
[8]  
[Anonymous], CURR MED RES PRACT
[9]   Global health and primary care research [J].
Beasley, John W. ;
Starfield, Barbara ;
van Weel, Chris ;
Rosser, Walter W. ;
Haq, Cynthia L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2007, 20 (06) :518-526
[10]   Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the United States Primary Care Assessment Tool (expanded version) for use in South Africa [J].
Bresick, Graham ;
Sayed, Abdul-Rauf ;
le Grange, Cynthia ;
Bhagwan, Susheela ;
Manga, Nayna .
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE & FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 7 (01)