Understanding maternity waiting home uptake and scale-up within low-income and middle-income countries: a programme theory from a realist review and synthesis

被引:6
作者
Uwamahoro, Nadege Sandrine [1 ,2 ]
McRae, Daphne [1 ,3 ]
Zibrowski, Elaine [4 ]
Victor-Uadiale, Ify [5 ]
Gilmore, Brynne [6 ]
Bergen, Nicole [7 ]
Muhajarine, Nazeem [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Fac Med Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Chilliwack Gen Hosp, Chilliwack Div Family Practice, Chilliwack, BC, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Best Care COPD, London, ON, Canada
[5] Queen Margaret Univ, Inst Global Hlth & Dev, Musselburgh, Scotland
[6] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Hlth Syst, UCD Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Educ & Innovat Hlth, Belfield, Ireland
[7] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Saskatchewan, Populat Hlth & Evaluat Res Unit, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2022年 / 7卷 / 09期
关键词
Maternal health; Other study design; Prevention strategies; Obstetrics; Health services research; SAVING MOTHERS; COMMUNITY; CARE; WOMEN; DIFFUSION; ACCESS; MODEL; INTERVENTION; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009605
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) link pregnant women to skilled birth attendance at health facilities. Research suggests that some MWH-facility birth interventions are more success at meeting the needs and expectations of their intended users than others. We aimed to develop theory regarding what resources work to support uptake and scale-up of MHW-facility birth interventions, how, for whom, in what contexts and why. Methods A four-step realist review was conducted which included development of an initial programme theory; searches for evidence; selection, appraisal and extraction of data; and analysis and data synthesis. Results A programme theory was developed from 106 secondary sources and 12 primary interviews with MWH implementers. The theory demonstrated that uptake and scale-up of the MWH-facility birth intervention depends on complex interactions between three adopter groups: health system stakeholders, community gatekeepers and pregnant women and their families. It describes relationships between 19 contexts, 11 mechanisms and 31 outcomes accross nine context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) which were grouped into 3 themes: (1) Engaging stakeholders to develop, integrate, and sustain MWH-facility birth interventions, (2) Promoting and enabling MWH-facility birth utilisation and (3) Creating positive and memorable MWH-facility birth user experiences. Belief, trust, empowerment, health literacy and perceptions of safety, comfort and dignity were mechanisms that supported diffusion and adoption of the intervention within communities and health systems. Examples of resources provided by implementers to trigger mechanisms associated with each CMOC were identified. Conclusions Implementers of MWHs cannot merely assume that communities will collectively value an MWH-facility birth experience over delivery at home. We posit that MWH-facility birth interventions become vulnerable to under-utilisation when implementers fail to: (1) remove barriers that hinder women's access to MWH and (2) ensure that conditions and interactions experienced within the MWH and its affiliated health facility support women to feel treated with compassion, dignity and respect. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020173595.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 166 条
  • [1] Abdulkadir RW, 2017, AWARENESS ATTITUDE U, P24
  • [2] Vaginal examinations and mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth in health facilities: secondary analysis of labour observations in Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria
    Adu-Bonsaffoh, Kwame
    Mehrtash, Hedieh
    Guure, Chris
    Maya, Ernest
    Vogel, Joshua P.
    Irinyenikan, Theresa Azonima
    Aderoba, Adeniyi Kolade
    Balde, Mamadou Dioulde
    Adanu, Richard
    Bohren, Meghan A.
    Tuncalp, Ozge
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 5 (SUPPL_2):
  • [3] Agyenim-Boateng A., 2021, INT J AFR NURS SCI, V15, DOI [10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100326, DOI 10.1016/J.IJANS.2021.100326]
  • [4] How is implementation research applied to advance health in low-income and middle-income countries?
    Alonge, Olakunle
    Rodriguez, Daniela Cristina
    Brandes, Neal
    Geng, Elvin
    Reveiz, Ludovic
    Peters, David H.
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (02):
  • [5] Andemichael G., 2010, J ERITREAN MED ASS, V4, P18
  • [6] Innovations in maternal and child health: case studies from Uganda
    Awor, Phyllis
    Nabiryo, Maxencia
    Manderson, Lenore
    [J]. INFECTIOUS DISEASES OF POVERTY, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [7] Maternity waiting areas - serving all women? Barriers and enablers of an equity-oriented maternal health intervention in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
    Bergen, Nicole
    Abebe, Lakew
    Asfaw, Shifera
    Kiros, Getachew
    Kulkarni, Manisha A.
    Mamo, Abebe
    Morankar, Sudhakar
    Labonte, Ronald
    [J]. GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 14 (10) : 1509 - 1523
  • [8] Subnational health management and the advancement of health equity: a case study of Ethiopia
    Bergen, Nicole
    Ruckert, Arne
    Kulkarni, Manisha A.
    Abebe, Lakew
    Morankar, Sudhakar
    Labonte, Ronald
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [9] Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis
    Bohren, Meghan A.
    Hunter, Erin C.
    Munthe-Kaas, Heather M.
    Souza, Joao Paulo
    Vogel, Joshua P.
    Guelmezoglu, A. Metin
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2014, 11
  • [10] Quality and utilization patterns of maternity waiting homes at referral facilities in rural Zambia: A mixed-methods multiple case analysis of intervention and standard of care sites
    Bonawitz, Rachael
    McGlasson, Kathleen L.
    Kaiser, Jeanette L.
    Ngoma, Thandiwe
    Fong, Rachel M.
    Biemba, Godfrey
    Bwalya, Misheck
    Hamer, Davidson H.
    Scott, Nancy A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):