A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis

被引:5
作者
Song, Ho-Yong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huh, Yoon-Hyuk [1 ,2 ]
Park, Chan-Jin [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Lee-Ra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gangneung Wonju Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 7 Jukheon Gil, Kangnung 25457, Gangwondo, South Korea
[2] Gangneung Wonju Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Res Inst Oral Sci, Kangnung 25457, Gangwondo, South Korea
[3] Ye Dent Clin, Chunchon, South Korea
关键词
Bone level; Finite element analysis; Implant diameter; Short implant; SINUS FLOOR; DENTAL IMPLANTS; WIDE IMPLANTS; ELEVATION; MULTICENTER; 8-YEAR;
D O I
10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.304
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of 2-short implants (2SIs) installed in a severely atrophic maxillary molar site. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three different diameters of internal connection implants were modeled: narrow platform (NP), regular platform (RP), and wide platform (WP). The maxillary first molars were restored with one implant or two short implants. Three 2SI models (NP-oblique, NP-vertical, and NP-horizontal) and four single implant models (RP and WP in a centered or cantilevered position) were used. Axial and oblique loadings were applied on the occlusal surface of the crown. The von Mises stress values were measured at the bone-implant, peri-implant bone, and implant/abutment complex. RESULTS. The highest stress distribution at the bone-implant interface and the peri-implant bone was noticed in the RP group, and the lowest stress distribution was observed in the 2SI groups. Cantilevered position showed unfavorable stress distribution with axial loading. 2SI types did not affect the stress distribution in oblique loading. The number and installation positions of the implant, rather than the bone level, influenced the stress distribution of 2SIs. The implant/abutment complex of WP presented the highest stress concentration while that of 2SIs showed the lowest stress concentration. CONCLUSION. 2SIs may be useful for achieving stable stress distribution on the surrounding bone and implant-abutment complex in the atrophic posterior maxilla.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 312
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Akça K, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P115
[2]  
ANDERSON D J, 1956, J Dent Res, V35, P664, DOI 10.1177/00220345560350050201
[3]  
Bahat O, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P151
[4]  
Balshi TJ, 1997, INT J PERIODONT REST, V17, P427
[5]   Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants .1. 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants [J].
Buser, D ;
MericskeStern, R ;
Bernard, JP ;
Behneke, A ;
Behneke, N ;
Hirt, HP ;
Belser, UC ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (03) :161-172
[6]  
Çaglar A, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P36
[7]   Cumulative survival rate and complication rates of single-tooth implant; focused on the coronal fracture of fixture in the internal connection implant [J].
Cha, H. -S. ;
Kim, Y. -S. ;
Jeon, J. -H. ;
Lee, J. -H. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2013, 40 (08) :595-602
[8]  
Collings E.W., 1984, ASM HDB, P3
[9]  
das Neves FD, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P86
[10]  
Friberg B, 2000, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V2, P184