C2 monitoring strategy for optimising cyclosporin immunosuppression from the neoral®1 formulation

被引:145
作者
Levy, GA [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00063030-200115050-00001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Profiling of absorption of cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral((R))) is a concept in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) designed to further optimise the clinical benefits of this formulation in transplant recipients. A single blood concentration measurement 2 hours after Neoral((R)) administration (Cz) has been shown in both Liver and kidney transplant recipients to be a significantly more accurate predictor of drug exposure than trough concentrations (C-0), and its use results in a reduction in the incidence and severity of cellular rejection. In a prospective trial in de novo renal transplant recipients, patients who achieved target concentrations for area under the concentration-rime curve over the first 4 hours postdose (AUC(0-4h)) of 4500 to 5500 ng (.) h/ml within 5 days of transplantation had a 7% incidence of histological acute rejection, compared with 37% rejection in those patients who did not achieve this target level. Of the single sampling points, C-2 correlates best with AUC(0-4h) (r(2) = 0.86); C-0 had the poorest correlation. In an international study in 21 centres examining the absorption profiling, C-2 samples were the most accurate predictors of AUC(0-4h) and freedom from rejection. In liver transplant recipients receiving Neoral((R))-based maintenance immunosuppression, adoption of Neoral((R)) C-2 monitoring identifies patients who are both over- and under-dosed, which is not distinguished by C-0 measurements. Further adjustment of C-2 to recommended targets, even at 5 and 10 years after transplantation, results in reduction in nephrotoxicity without exposing the patient to the risk of rejection. In summary, despite a level of simplicity comparable to C-0 measurement, Neoral((R)) absorption profiling, and specifically C-2 measurement, is a much more sensitive approach to assessing the pharmacokinetics and predicting the clinical effect of this formulation in the individual patient, with a consequent marked reduction in the incidence of acute cellular rejection and improved long term graft function.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 290
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Amante AJ, 1996, TRANSPLANT P, V28, P2162
[2]  
Barama A, 2000, TRANSPLANTATION, V69, pS162
[3]   Impact of absorption profiling on efficacy and safety of cyclosporin therapy in transplant recipients [J].
Belitsky, P ;
Dunn, S ;
Johnston, A ;
Levy, G .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2000, 39 (02) :117-125
[4]   Neoral absorption profiling: An evolution in effectiveness [J].
Belitsky, P ;
Levy, GA ;
Johnston, A .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (3A) :45S-52S
[5]  
COLE E, 2001, AM J TRANSPLANT, V1, P386
[6]   Peak cyclosporine levels (Cmax) correlate with freedom from liver graft rejection -: Results of a prospective, randomized comparison of neoral and sandimmune for liver transplantation (NOF-8) [J].
Grant, D ;
Kneteman, N ;
Tchervenkov, J ;
Roy, A ;
Murphy, G ;
Tan, A ;
Hendricks, L ;
Guilbault, N ;
Levy, G .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (08) :1133-1137
[7]  
GREVEL J, 1991, CLIN CHEM, V37, P1905
[8]   The temporal profile of calcineurin inhibition by cyclosporine in vivo [J].
Halloran, PF ;
Helms, LMH ;
Kung, L ;
Noujaim, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (09) :1356-1361
[9]   Pharmacokinetic validation of neoral absorption profiling [J].
Johnston, A ;
David, OJ ;
Cooney, GF .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (3A) :53S-56S
[10]  
JOHNSTON A, 1990, TRANSPLANT P, V22, P1345