Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence

被引:129
作者
Brothers, Trevor
Swaab, Tamara Y.
Traxler, Matthew J.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Mind & Brain, Davis, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Prediction; N250; N400; Sentence processing; Event-related potentials; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; SEMANTIC INTEGRATION; TIME-COURSE; N400; ERP; PREDICTABILITY; CONSTRAINT; EXPECTANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Readers may use contextual information to anticipate and pre-activate specific lexical items during reading. However, prior studies have not clearly dissociated the effects of accurate lexical prediction from other forms of contextual facilitation such as plausibility or semantic priming. In this study, we measured electrophysiological responses to predicted and unpredicted target words in passages providing varying levels of contextual support. This method was used to isolate the neural effects of prediction from other potential contextual influences on lexical processing. While both prediction and discourse context influenced ERP amplitudes within the time range of the N400, the effects of prediction occurred much more rapidly, preceding contextual facilitation by approximately 100 ms. In addition, a frontal, post-N400 positivity (PNP) was modulated by both prediction accuracy and the overall plausibility of the preceding passage. These results suggest a unique temporal primacy for prediction in facilitating lexical access. They also suggest that the frontal PNP may index the costs of revising discourse representations following an incorrect lexical prediction. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 149
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Stimulus Predictability Reduces Responses in Primary Visual Cortex [J].
Alink, Arjen ;
Schwiedrzik, Caspar M. ;
Kohler, Axel ;
Singer, Wolf ;
Muckli, Lars .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (08) :2960-2966
[2]   Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing [J].
Altmann, Gerry T. M. ;
Mirkovic, Jelena .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2009, 33 (04) :583-609
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Foundations of Language
[4]   CONTEXTUAL PREREQUISITES FOR UNDERSTANDING - SOME INVESTIGATIONS OF COMPREHENSION AND RECALL [J].
BRANSFORD, JD ;
JOHNSON, MK .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :717-726
[5]   EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL COMPONENTS REFLECT PHONOLOGICAL AND SEMANTIC PROCESSING OF THE TERMINAL WORD OF SPOKEN SENTENCES [J].
CONNOLLY, JF ;
PHILLIPS, NA .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1994, 6 (03) :256-266
[6]   Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity [J].
DeLong, KA ;
Urbach, TP ;
Kutas, M .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 8 (08) :1117-1121
[7]   Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension [J].
DeLong, Katherine A. ;
Quante, Laura ;
Kutas, Marta .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 61 :150-162
[8]   Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations [J].
Delong, Katherine A. ;
Urbach, Thomas P. ;
Groppe, David M. ;
Kutas, Marta .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (09) :1203-1207
[9]   Before the N400: Effects of lexical-semantic violations in visual cortex [J].
Dikker, Suzanne ;
Pylkkanen, Liina .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2011, 118 (1-2) :23-28
[10]   FINDING STRUCTURE IN TIME [J].
ELMAN, JL .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1990, 14 (02) :179-211