Assessment of tracheal intubation in children after induction with propofol and different doses of remifentanil

被引:39
作者
Blair, JM
Hill, DA
Wilson, CM
Fee, JPH
机构
[1] Epsom & St Helier NHS Trust, St Helier Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Carshalton SM5 1AA, Surrey, England
[2] Ulster Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
anaesthetics; intravenous; propofol; analgesics; opioid; remifentanil; intubation : tracheal; anaesthesia : paediatric;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03524.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Tracheal intubating conditions were assessed in 112 children after induction of anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil 1.0, 2.0 or 3.0 mug.kg(-1). Subjects in a control group were given propofol and mivacurium 0.2 mg.kg(-1). Haemodynamic and respiratory parameters were recorded. Plasma catecholamine levels were measured in a subgroup of 40 children. Intubating conditions were acceptable in 14/28 (50%), 18/26 (69%) and 22/27 (82%) in those subjects given remifentanil 1.0, 2.0 or 3.0 mug.kg(-1), respectively, and in 27/28 (96%) of the control group. Intubating conditions in subjects given remifentanil 3.0 mug.kg(-1) were better than in those given remifentanil 1.0 mug.kg(-1) (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intubating conditions between those given remifentanil 3.0 mug.kg(-1) and the control group. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate increased in response to tracheal intubation in subjects given remifentanil 1.0 mug.kg(-1) and in the control group (p < 0.05). Time to resumption of spontaneous respiration was prolonged in subjects given remifentanil 3.0 mug.kg(-1) (p < 0.001). In conclusion, remifentanil 2 mug.kg(-1) provides acceptable intubating conditions and haemodynamic stability without prolonging the return of spontaneous respiration.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 33
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Dosing study of remifentanil and propofol for tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants [J].
Alexander, R ;
Olufolabi, AJ ;
Booth, J ;
El-Moalem, HE ;
Glass, PS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (11) :1037-1040
[2]   Comparison of remifentanil with alfentanil or suxamethonium following propofol anaesthesia for tracheal intubation [J].
Alexander, R ;
Booth, J ;
Olufolabi, AJ ;
El-Moalem, HE ;
Glass, PS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (11) :1032-1036
[3]  
Blair JM, 2000, ANAESTHESIA, V55, P501
[4]   PLASMA-CATECHOLAMINES AND NEONATAL CONDITION AFTER INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL OR THIOPENTONE AT CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
GIN, T ;
OMEARA, ME ;
KAN, AF ;
LEUNG, RKW ;
TAN, P ;
YAU, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 70 (03) :311-316
[5]  
GLASS PSA, 1993, ANESTHESIA ANALGESIA, V77, P1032
[6]   Tracheal intubation after induction of anesthesia in children with propofol - remifentanil or propofol-rocuronium [J].
Klemola, UM ;
Hiller, A .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (09) :854-859
[7]   Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol [J].
Klemola, UM ;
Mennander, S ;
Saarnivaara, L .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (04) :465-469
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF INTUBATING CONDITIONS IN CHILDREN AFTER INDUCTION WITH PROPOFOL AND VARYING DOSES OF ALFENTANIL [J].
MCCONAGHY, P ;
BUNTING, HE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 73 (05) :596-599
[9]  
Robinson DN, 1998, PAEDIATR ANAESTH, V8, P467
[10]   Tracheal intubation in ambulatory surgery patients: Using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants [J].
Stevens, JB ;
Wheatley, L .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (01) :45-49