Development and validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-short form (DFS-SF)

被引:75
作者
Bann, CM
Fehnel, SE
Gagnon, DD
机构
[1] RTI Int, Div Stat Res, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] RTI Int, RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[3] Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceut Res & Dev, Raritan, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200321170-00004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale (DFS) provides comprehensive measurement of the impact of diabetic foot ulcers on patients' QOL through self-administration of 64 items comprising 15 subscales. Objective: To develop and evaluate a short form of the DFS (DFS-SF) to reduce patient burden and the number of outcome measures, and to improve sensitivity to change in clinical condition. Methods: The DFS-SF was created through the analysis of data from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial of the efficacy and safety of becaplermin (recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB) in the treatment of chronic, full-thickness, neuropathic, diabetic foot ulcers. Using these data, items demonstrating poor psychometric properties were eliminated. Exploratory factor analyses were then conducted to develop a new, more parsimonious scaling algorithm that optimised the internal consistency of the new subscales. Finally, data from two additional clinical trials were used to assess replicability of the DFS-SF subscale structure. Results: The DFS-SF contains a total of 29 items comprising six subscales. The results of both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses provided support for the scaling algorithm. The DFS-SF subscales showed good internal consistency, reliability and construct validity, and demonstrated sensitivity to ulcer healing. Conclusions: The results of this investigation indicate that the DFS-SF has good psychometric properties and replicability.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1290
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Abetz L, 2002, Practical Diabetes International, V19, P167, DOI [10.1002/pdi.356, DOI 10.1002/PDI.356]
[2]  
Brod M, 1998, QUAL LIFE RES, V7, P365
[3]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[4]   Psychological status of diabetic people with or without lower limb disability [J].
Carrington, AL ;
Mawdsley, SKV ;
Morley, M ;
Kincey, J ;
Boulton, AJM .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1996, 32 (1-2) :19-25
[5]  
CONWAY K, 1998, QUAL LIFE RES, V7, P581
[6]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[7]   EVIDENCE ON SIMPLE STRUCTURE AND FACTOR INVARIANCE ACHIEVED BY 5 ROTATIONAL METHODS ON 4 TYPES OF DATA [J].
DIELMAN, TE ;
CATTELL, RB ;
WAGNER, A .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1972, 7 (02) :223-242
[8]  
FORSYTH BH, 1992, PUBLICATION US DHHS, V92, P13
[9]  
Gorsuch R., 2015, Factor analysis / by, V2nd
[10]   COMPARISON OF BIQUARTIMIN, MAXPLANE, PROMAX, AND VARIMAX [J].
GORSUCH, RL .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1970, 30 (04) :861-&