Efficacy and Safety of Initial 5Years of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

被引:2
作者
Liao, Hao [1 ]
Pei, Wendi [2 ,3 ]
Zhong, Jianxin [1 ]
Shao, Bin [1 ]
Liu, Xiaoran [1 ]
Liu, Yaxin [1 ]
Zhang, Jiayang [1 ]
Rugo, Hope S. [4 ]
Li, Huiping [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Canc Hosp & Inst, Key Lab Carcinogenesis & Translat Res, Minist Educ Beijing,Dept Breast Oncol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Minist Educ, Beijing Key Lab Reprod Endocrinol & Assisted Repr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Key Lab Assisted Reprod, Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
adjuvant endocrine therapy; early breast cancer; network meta-analysis; tamoxifen; aromatase inhibitor; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; AROMATASE INHIBITORS; CONTINUED TAMOXIFEN; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; DRUG-THERAPY; FOLLOW-UP; ANASTROZOLE; WOMEN; EXEMESTANE; LETROZOLE;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2022.886954
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify the optimal initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE to obtain relevant studies published between January 2000 and January 2022. Randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival and the secondary outcome was severe adverse effects (SAEs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was carried out to indirectly compare all regimens and the value of surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to obtain rankings. Results: Eleven studies with 49,987 subjects were included. For DFS, exemestane (EXE) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.87-0.96], anastrozole (ANA) (0.94, 0.90-0.97), letrozole (LET) (0.93, 0.89-0.97), tamoxifen (TAM) followed by EXE (0.91, 0.87-0.96), and TAM followed by ANA (0.92, 0.87-0.98) were more favorable than TAM, with TAM followed by EXE ranking as the first of SUCRA. For OS, only TAM followed by ANA showed significant superiority than TAM (HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.86-0.97) and ranked as the first of SUCRA. For SAEs, EXE (HR 1.72, 95%CI 1.04-2.98), ANA (1.58, 1.03-2.43), and LET (1.63, 1.02-2.57) showed greater associations with bone fracture than TAM. However, no significant difference in the incidences of cardiac events, thromboembolic events, and cerebrovascular events was found among all comparisons. Conclusion: The sequential use of aromatase inhibitors, which has the best curative effects and relatively mild side effects, may be the optimal treatment mode for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal EBC patients. In addition, the three kinds of aromatase inhibitors achieved roughly equal efficacy, but caused different types of SAEs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1687, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
  • [2] Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for Japanese postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive breast cancer: efficacy results of long-term follow-up data from the N-SAS BC 03 trial
    Aihara, Tomohiko
    Yokota, Isao
    Hozumi, Yasuo
    Aogi, Kenjiro
    Iwata, Hiroji
    Tamura, Motoshi
    Fukuuchi, Atsushi
    Makino, Haruhiko
    Kim, Ryungsa
    Andoh, Masashi
    Tsugawa, Koichiro
    Ohno, Shinji
    Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
    Ohashi, Yasuo
    Watanabe, Toru
    Takatsuka, Yuichi
    Mukai, Hirofumi
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 148 (02) : 337 - 343
  • [3] Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    Hammond, M. Elizabeth H.
    Dowsett, Mitchell
    McKernin, Shannon E.
    Carey, Lisa A.
    Fitzgibbons, Patrick L.
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    Lakhani, Sunil R.
    Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
    Perlmutter, Jane
    Perou, Charles M.
    Regan, Meredith M.
    Rimm, David L.
    Symmans, W. Fraser
    Torlakovic, Emina E.
    Varella, Leticia
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Weisberg, Tracey F.
    McShane, Lisa M.
    Wolff, Antonio C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) : 1346 - +
  • [4] BAUM M, 1983, LANCET, V1, P257
  • [5] Baum M, 2002, LANCET, V359, P2131
  • [6] Switching to anastrozole versus continued tamoxifen treatment of early breast cancer: Long term results of the Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole trial
    Boccardo, F.
    Guglielmini, P.
    Bordonaro, R.
    Fini, A.
    Massidda, B.
    Porpiglia, M.
    Roagna, R.
    Serra, P.
    Orzalesi, L.
    Ucci, G.
    Rubagotti, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (07) : 1546 - 1554
  • [7] Comparative clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetic interactions of aromatase inhibitors
    Boeddinghaus, IM
    Dowsett, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 79 (1-5) : 85 - 91
  • [8] Tamoxifen-treated breast carcinoma patients and the risk of acute myocardial infarction and newly-diagnosed angina
    Bradbury, BD
    Lash, TL
    Kaye, JA
    Jick, SS
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 103 (06) : 1114 - 1121
  • [9] Burstein HJ, 2010, J CLIN ONCOL, V28, P3784, DOI [10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3756, 10.1200/JOP.000082]
  • [10] Aromatase inhibitors and bone health in women with breast cancer
    Chien, Amy Jo
    Goss, Paul E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (33) : 5305 - 5312