SICODYN international benchmark on dynamic analysis of structure assemblies: variability and numerical-experimental correlation on an industrial pump

被引:8
作者
Audebert, Sylvie [1 ]
机构
[1] EDF Rech & Dev, Dept Anal Mecan & Acoust, F-92141 Clamart, France
来源
MECANIQUE & INDUSTRIES | 2010年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
Benchmark; structural dynamics; modal analysis; finite-elements; blind comparison; numerical-experimental correlation; numerical variability; uncertainty; model validation; error estimation; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; VALIDATION; UNCERTAINTIES; MODELS; ERROR;
D O I
10.1051/meca/2010063
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A benchmark is organised to quantify the variability relative to structure dynamics computations. The chosen demonstrator is a pump in service in thermal central units, which is an engineered system with not well-known parameters, considered in its work environment. The blind modal characterisation of the separate pump components shows a 5%-12% variability on eigenfrequency values and a less than 1.5% frequency error in comparison with experimental values. The numerical-experimental MAC numbers reach 0.7 at the maximum, even after updating. An example of modal results on the pump assembly fixed is presented, which shows a larger discrepancy with measurement values, essentially due to the modelling of the interfaces and boundary condition, and to the possible simplification of the main components F.E. models to reduce their size. Though a significant frequency error, the first overall modes are correctly identified. If this tendency can be confirmed from all the participants' results, the conclusion to be drawn is that, if the predictive capability of F.E. models to represent the dynamical behaviour of sub-structures is satisfactory, the one relative to structures that are built-up of several components does not allow their confident use. Additional information issued from measurements is needed to improve their accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 451
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Experimental case studies for uncertainty quantification in structural dynamics
    Adhikari, S.
    Friswell, M. I.
    Lonkar, K.
    Sarkar, A.
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2009, 24 (04) : 473 - 492
  • [2] Allemang R, 2003, SOUND VIBRATION, P14
  • [3] [Anonymous], SOUND VIBRATION
  • [4] Probabilistic investigation of sensitivities of advanced test-analysis model correlation methods
    Bergman, Elizabeth J.
    Allen, Matthew S.
    Kammer, Daniel C.
    Mayes, Randall L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2010, 329 (13) : 2516 - 2531
  • [5] A reduced order, test verified component mode synthesis approach for system modeling applications
    Butland, Adam
    Avitabile, Peter
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 24 (04) : 904 - 921
  • [6] Effect of uncertainties on substructure coupling: Modelling and reduction strategies
    D'Ambrogio, Walter
    Fregolent, Annalisa
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 23 (03) : 588 - 605
  • [7] EWINS D, 2009, BENCHMARK INT MA OCT
  • [8] Robust tools for prediction of variability and optimization in structural dynamics
    Guedri, M.
    Ghanmi, S.
    Majed, R.
    Bouhaddi, N.
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 23 (04) : 1123 - 1133
  • [9] Validation challenge workshop
    Hills, Richard G.
    Pilch, Martin
    Dowding, Kevin J.
    Red-Horse, John
    Paez, Thomas L.
    Babuska, Ivo
    Tempone, Raul
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 197 (29-32) : 2375 - 2380
  • [10] Component mode synthesis as a framework for uncertainty analysis
    Hinke, L.
    Dohnal, F.
    Mace, B. R.
    Waters, T. P.
    Ferguson, N. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2009, 324 (1-2) : 161 - 178