Smart watch evaluation with integrated hesitant fuzzy linguistic SAW-ARAS technique

被引:39
作者
Buyukozkan, Gulcin [1 ]
Guler, Merve [1 ]
机构
[1] Galatasaray Univ, Ind Engn Dept, TR-34349 Ortakoy Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Multi criteria decision making; Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets; Smart watch; SAW; ARAS; Group decision making; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; TERM SETS; SELECTION; TOPSIS; MANAGEMENT; EXTENSION; SYSTEM; MODEL; METHODOLOGY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107353
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many organizations use wearable devices to increase their operational efficiency and strengthen their competitive advantage. In such decisions, managers can find it difficult to select the right device for their company. To address the Smart Watch (SW) selection problem, this article introduces an assessment framework established on a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic (HFL) Multi-Criteria Decision-Making technique to collectively consider parameters affecting the eventual decision. Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets (HFLTS) are utilized to integrate choices of decision makers into the decision-making procedure, where their thoughts and ideas about a decision problem can be of an uncertain nature, making it hard to express their assessments with crisp numbers. The proposed method handles the partiality in decision-making processes with a Group Decision Making (GDM) approach. This paper first showcases an integrated HFL Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)-HFL Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) method. The framework's functionality is then illustrated in a case study about SW assessment. The originality of the paper is based on its evaluation framework using an integrated SAW-ARAS approach in the hesitant fuzzy environment, its research method and case application in the logistics sector. This approach can guide managers and practitioners for an effective SW selection process. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Hospital performance evaluation by a hesitant fuzzy linguistic best worst method with inconsistency repairing [J].
Liao, Huchang ;
Mi, Xiaomei ;
Yu, Qin ;
Luo, Li .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 232 :657-671
[32]   Hesitant fuzzy linguistic prioritized superiority and inferiority ranking method and its application in sustainable energy technology evaluation [J].
Zhao, Na ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Ren, Zhiliang .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 478 :239-257
[33]   A Novel Group TODIM Method Based on Multi-Granularity Proportional Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Water Resources Risk Evaluation [J].
Li, Liang ;
Liu, Yanwu ;
Tu, Yan ;
Zhou, Xiaoyang ;
Lev, Benjamin .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2022, 31 (05) :913-944
[34]   An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection [J].
Gong, Jia-Wei ;
Liu, Hu-Chen ;
You, Xiao-Yue ;
Yin, Linsen .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 102
[35]   Evaluation of startup companies using multicriteria decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic information envelopment analysis models [J].
Lin, Mingwei ;
Chen, Zheyu ;
Chen, Riqing ;
Fujita, Hamido .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 36 (05) :2292-2322
[36]   An integrated hesitant 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy decision-making method for single-pilot operations mechanism evaluation [J].
Gao, Fei ;
Zhang, Ying ;
Li, Yijia ;
Bi, Wenhao .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 130 :1-14
[37]   Assessment of renewable energy sources for smart cities' demand satisfaction using multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic based choquet integral approach [J].
Krishankumar, Raghunathan ;
Pamucar, Dragan ;
Deveci, Muhammet ;
Aggarwal, Manish ;
Ravichandran, Kattur Soundarapandian .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 189 :1428-1442
[38]   Evaluation of MOOCs based on multigranular unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic MABAC method [J].
Rong, Lili ;
Wang, Lei ;
Liu, Peide ;
Zhu, Baoying .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 36 (10) :5670-5713
[39]   A hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets-based AHP approach for analyzing the performance evaluation factors: an application to cargo sector [J].
Tuysuz, Fatih ;
Simsek, Berna .
COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2017, 3 (03) :167-175
[40]   Decision-analytics-based green performance evaluation in the railway transportation industry - An integrated hesitant fuzzy approach [J].
Norouzi, Ashraf ;
Pamucar, Dragan ;
Simic, Vladimir .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2025, 31