Association of preservative-free propofol use and outcome in critically ill patients

被引:5
作者
Haddad, Samir [1 ]
Tamim, Hani [2 ]
Memish, Ziad A. [3 ]
Arabi, Yaseen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdul Aziz Med City, Dept Intens Care, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Med, Dept Med Educ, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Minist Hlth, Prevent Med Directorate, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Infection; sepsis; intensive care unit; mortality; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; INFUSION SYNDROME; INFECTIONS; CONTAMINATION; GUIDELINES; SEDATION; THERAPY; FAILURE; ICU;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2010.05.027
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Propofol is widely used to provide sedation to patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study examined whether preservative-free propofol infusion independently influences outcome in critically ill patients. Methods: This was a nested cohort study within a randomized controlled trial. ICU patients who received preservative-free propofol and those who did not were compared. The following data were collected: demographic information, APACHE II score, admission category, chronic severe illnesses, nutritional data, and blood glucose level and insulin dose. The main exposure was the use of preservative-free propofol infusion. The main outcomes were the occurrence of ICU-acquired infections, ICU-acquired sepsis, and ICU and hospital mortality. Results: A total of 523 patients were included (no propofol group, n = 399; propofol group, n = 124). After adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics, preservative-free propofol use was associated with increased risk of ICU-acquired infections (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-3.06; P = .009) and ICU-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock (aOR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.12-3.28; P = .02), but not with ICU or hospital mortality. Conclusion: Preservative-free propofol infusion in critically ill patients may be associated with increased risk of ICU-acquired infections and ICU-acquired sepsis, with no significant difference in ICU or hospital mortality. This association might have been related to the use of preservative-free preparations.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 147
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
*AM SOC AN COMM OC, 1998, REC INF CONTR PRACT
[2]  
Tablan Ofelia C, 2004, MMWR Recomm Rep, V53, P1
[3]   Weekend and weeknight admissions have the same outcome of weekday admissions to an intensive care unit with onsite intensivist coverage [J].
Arabi, Y ;
Alshimemeri, A ;
Taher, S .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (03) :605-611
[4]  
Arabi Yaseen, 2007, Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, V19, P429
[5]   Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: A randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients [J].
Arabi, Yaseen M. ;
Dabbagh, Ousama C. ;
Tamim, Hani M. ;
Al-Shimemeri, Abdullah A. ;
Memish, Ziad A. ;
Haddad, Samir H. ;
Syed, Sofia J. ;
Giridhar, Hema R. ;
Rishu, Asgar H. ;
Al-Daker, Mouhamad O. ;
Kahoul, Salim H. ;
Britts, Riette J. ;
Sakkijha, Maram H. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (12) :3190-3197
[6]  
*ASTRAZENECA, COR DAT SHEET DIPRIV
[7]   In-use contamination of propofol. A clinical study [J].
Bach, A ;
Motsch, J ;
Schmidt, H ;
Bottiger, BW ;
Bohrer, H ;
Martin, E ;
Sonntag, HG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 14 (02) :178-183
[8]   POSTOPERATIVE INFECTIONS TRACED TO CONTAMINATION OF AN INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC, PROPOFOL [J].
BENNETT, SN ;
MCNEIL, MM ;
BLAND, LA ;
ARDUINO, MJ ;
VILLARINO, ME ;
PERROTTA, DM ;
BURWEN, DR ;
WELBEL, SF ;
PEGUES, DA ;
STROUD, L ;
ZEITZ, PS ;
JARVIS, WR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (03) :147-154
[9]  
BERRY AJ, 1995, RECOMMENDATIONS HAND
[10]   Propofol infusion syndrome: An unusual cause of renal failure [J].
Casserly, B ;
O'Mahony, E ;
Timm, EG ;
Haqqie, S ;
Eisele, G ;
Urizar, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2004, 44 (06) :e98-e101