Power Laws in altmetrics: An empirical analysis

被引:16
作者
Banshal, Sumit Kumar [1 ]
Gupta, Solanki [2 ]
Lathabai, Hiran H. [3 ]
Singh, Vivek Kumar [2 ]
机构
[1] Daffodil Int Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
[2] Banaras Hindu Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Varanasi 221005, India
[3] Indian Inst Sci, DST Ctr Policy Res, Bengaluru 560012, India
关键词
Altmetrics; Exponentialdistribution; Log-normaldistribution; PowerLaws; Scientometrics; Socialmediamentions; DISCIPLINARY DIFFERENCES; SCHOLARLY ARTICLES; DISTRIBUTIONS; CITATIONS; ECONOMICS; CORRELATE; PATTERNS; METRICS; NUMBER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2022.101309
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Power Laws are a characteristic distribution found in both natural as well as in man-made sys-tems. Previous studies have shown that citations to scientific articles follow a power law, i.e., the number of papers having a certain level of citation x are proportional to x raised to some negative power. However, the distributional character of altmetrics (such as reads, likes, men-tions, etc.) has not been studied in much detail, particularly with respect to existence of power law behaviours. This article, therefore, attempts to do an empirical analysis of altmetric mention data of a large set of scholarly articles to see if they exhibit power law. The individual and the composite data series of 'mentions' on the various platforms are fit to a power law distribution, and the parameters and goodness of fit are determined, both using least squares regression as well as the Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE) approach. We also explore the fit of the mention data to other distribution families like the Log-normal and exponential distributions. Results obtained confirm the existence of power law behaviour in social media mentions to scholarly articles. The Log-normal distribution also looks plausible but is not found to be statistically significant, and the exponential distribution does not show a good fit. Major implications of power law in altmetrics are given and interesting research questions are posed in pursuit of enhancing the reliability of altmetrics for research evaluation purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Adamic IA, 2001, COMMUN ACM, V44, P55, DOI 10.1145/383694.383707
[2]  
Adamic L. A., 2000, Zipf, Power -laws, and Pareto-a ranking tutorial
[3]   powerlaw: A Python']Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions [J].
Alstott, Jeff ;
Bullmore, Edward T. ;
Plenz, Dietmar .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ALTMETRICS MANIFESTO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1949, Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least-Effort
[6]   Can altmetric mentions predict later citations? A test of validity on data from ResearchGate and three social media platforms [J].
Banshal, Sumit Kumar ;
Singh, Vivek Kumar ;
Muhuri, Pranab Kumar .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2021, 45 (03) :517-536
[7]  
Banshal SK, 2019, PRO INT CONF SCI INF, P1870
[8]   How much research output from India gets social media attention? [J].
Banshal, Sumit Kumar ;
Singh, Vivek Kumar ;
Muhuri, Pranab K. ;
Mayr, Philipp .
CURRENT SCIENCE, 2019, 117 (05) :753-760
[9]   An altmetric analysis of scholarly articles from India [J].
Banshal, Sumit Kumar ;
Singh, Vivek Kumar ;
Kaderye, Golam ;
Muhuri, Pranab Kumar ;
Priego Sanchez, Belem .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 34 (05) :3111-3118
[10]   Astrophysics publications on arXiv, Scopus and Mendeley: a case study [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 100 (01) :217-225