Why are charging stations associated with electric vehicle adoption? Untangling effects in three United States metropolitan areas

被引:41
作者
White, Lee V. [1 ,5 ]
Carrel, Andre L. [2 ,3 ]
Shi, Wei [4 ]
Sintov, Nicole D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, 2021 Coffey Rd, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, 2070 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, City & Reg Planning Sect, Knowlton Sch Architecture, 275 West Woodruff Ave, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Ford Motor Co, Global Data Insight & Analyt, Michigan Ave, Dearborn, MI USA
[5] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Regulat & Global Governance, 8 Fellows Rd, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Electric vehicle; Charging station; Range anxiety; Subjective norms; Mediation analysis; Transport policy; SELF-IDENTITY; RANGE; INCENTIVES; MOBILITY; IMPACT; POLICY; PREFERENCES; INTENTION; PURCHASE; DRIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2022.102663
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many policies to support battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption involve roll-out of public charging stations. While greater density of public charging stations is correlated with higher BEV adoption, the mechanisms underlying this effect are not well understood. We use a sample of 1467 online survey respondents living in the metropolitan areas of Los Angeles, Dallas/Fort Worth, and Atlanta in the United States to investigate three potential mechanisms through which greater public charging station density could shape BEV adoption intent. These three potential mechanisms are lower range anxiety, lower perceived mobility restriction, and more positive pro-BEV subjective norms. Multiple regression with ordinary least squares is used to investigate associations between charging station density and adoption intent. Multiple mediation analysis is then used to evaluate the three potential mechanisms for impact of charging station density on BEV adoption intent, and indicates that greater perceived subjective norms in support of BEVs explain much of the association between charger density and adoption intent. Range anxiety plays a smaller and less robust role as a mechanism, while perceived mobility restriction has no direct or indirect effect on BEV adoption intent. That is, we found no indication that BEV adoption intent is influenced by expectations that BEVs are unable to meet mobility needs. Findings indicate that norms are particularly important for investments in charging infrastructure to translate to more BEVs on the road.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[51]   How does the presence of HOV lanes affect plug-in electric vehicle adoption in California? A generalized propensity score approach [J].
Sheldon, Tamara L. ;
DeShazo, J. R. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 85 :146-170
[52]   The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption [J].
Sierzchula, William ;
Bakker, Sjoerd ;
Maat, Kees ;
van Wee, Bert .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 :183-194
[53]   Predictors of intention to buy a battery electric vehicle among conventional car drivers [J].
Simsekoglu, Ozlem ;
Nayum, Alim .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 60 :1-10
[54]   Rapid estimation of electric vehicle acceptance using a general description of driving patterns [J].
Tamor, Michael A. ;
Moraal, Paul E. ;
Reprogle, Briana ;
Milacic, Milos .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 51 :136-148
[55]  
Triplett T., 2016, AM DRIVING SURVEY 20
[56]   The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour [J].
van der Werff, Ellen ;
Steg, Linda ;
Keizer, Kees .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 34 :55-63
[57]   The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China [J].
Wang, Shanyong ;
Li, Jun ;
Zhao, Dingtao .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 105 :14-26
[58]   You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions [J].
White, Lee V. ;
Sintov, Nicole D. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 99 :94-113
[59]   The impact of government policy on preference for NEVs: The evidence from China [J].
Zhang, Xian ;
Wang, Ke ;
Hao, Yu ;
Fan, Jing-Li ;
Wei, Yi-Ming .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 61 :382-393