Why are charging stations associated with electric vehicle adoption? Untangling effects in three United States metropolitan areas

被引:30
作者
White, Lee V. [1 ,5 ]
Carrel, Andre L. [2 ,3 ]
Shi, Wei [4 ]
Sintov, Nicole D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, 2021 Coffey Rd, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, 2070 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, City & Reg Planning Sect, Knowlton Sch Architecture, 275 West Woodruff Ave, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Ford Motor Co, Global Data Insight & Analyt, Michigan Ave, Dearborn, MI USA
[5] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Regulat & Global Governance, 8 Fellows Rd, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Electric vehicle; Charging station; Range anxiety; Subjective norms; Mediation analysis; Transport policy; SELF-IDENTITY; RANGE; INCENTIVES; MOBILITY; IMPACT; POLICY; PREFERENCES; INTENTION; PURCHASE; DRIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2022.102663
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many policies to support battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption involve roll-out of public charging stations. While greater density of public charging stations is correlated with higher BEV adoption, the mechanisms underlying this effect are not well understood. We use a sample of 1467 online survey respondents living in the metropolitan areas of Los Angeles, Dallas/Fort Worth, and Atlanta in the United States to investigate three potential mechanisms through which greater public charging station density could shape BEV adoption intent. These three potential mechanisms are lower range anxiety, lower perceived mobility restriction, and more positive pro-BEV subjective norms. Multiple regression with ordinary least squares is used to investigate associations between charging station density and adoption intent. Multiple mediation analysis is then used to evaluate the three potential mechanisms for impact of charging station density on BEV adoption intent, and indicates that greater perceived subjective norms in support of BEVs explain much of the association between charger density and adoption intent. Range anxiety plays a smaller and less robust role as a mechanism, while perceived mobility restriction has no direct or indirect effect on BEV adoption intent. That is, we found no indication that BEV adoption intent is influenced by expectations that BEVs are unable to meet mobility needs. Findings indicate that norms are particularly important for investments in charging infrastructure to translate to more BEVs on the road.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [11] Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers' intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle
    Dumortier, Jerome
    Siddiki, Saba
    Carley, Sanya
    Cisney, Joshua
    Krause, Rachel M.
    Lane, Bradley W.
    Rupp, John A.
    Graham, John D.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 72 : 71 - 86
  • [12] Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions
    Egbue, Ona
    Long, Suzanna
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 48 : 717 - 729
  • [13] Electric vehicle adoption in Sweden and the impact of local policy instruments
    Egner, Filippa
    Trosvik, Lina
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 121 : 584 - 596
  • [14] The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?
    Eisinga, Rob
    te Grotenhuis, Manfred
    Pelzer, Ben
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 58 (04) : 637 - 642
  • [15] Field A, 2018, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, V5th
  • [16] Does this range suit me? Range satisfaction of battery electric vehicle users
    Franke, Thomas
    Guenther, Madlen
    Trantow, Maria
    Krems, Josef F.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2017, 65 : 191 - 199
  • [17] Which Factors Can Protect Against Range Stress in Everyday Usage of Battery Electric Vehicles? Toward Enhancing Sustainability of Electric Mobility Systems
    Franke, Thomas
    Rauh, Nadine
    Guenther, Madlen
    Trantow, Maria
    Krems, Josef F.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2016, 58 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [18] What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users?
    Franke, Thomas
    Krems, Josef F.
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2013, 30 : 56 - 62
  • [19] Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use
    Franke, Thomas
    Krems, Josef F.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2013, 48 : 109 - 122
  • [20] Experiencing Range in an Electric Vehicle: Understanding Psychological Barriers
    Franke, Thomas
    Neumann, Isabel
    Buehler, Franziska
    Cocron, Peter
    Krems, Josef F.
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2012, 61 (03): : 368 - 391