Why are charging stations associated with electric vehicle adoption? Untangling effects in three United States metropolitan areas

被引:30
作者
White, Lee V. [1 ,5 ]
Carrel, Andre L. [2 ,3 ]
Shi, Wei [4 ]
Sintov, Nicole D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, 2021 Coffey Rd, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, 2070 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, City & Reg Planning Sect, Knowlton Sch Architecture, 275 West Woodruff Ave, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Ford Motor Co, Global Data Insight & Analyt, Michigan Ave, Dearborn, MI USA
[5] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Regulat & Global Governance, 8 Fellows Rd, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Electric vehicle; Charging station; Range anxiety; Subjective norms; Mediation analysis; Transport policy; SELF-IDENTITY; RANGE; INCENTIVES; MOBILITY; IMPACT; POLICY; PREFERENCES; INTENTION; PURCHASE; DRIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2022.102663
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many policies to support battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption involve roll-out of public charging stations. While greater density of public charging stations is correlated with higher BEV adoption, the mechanisms underlying this effect are not well understood. We use a sample of 1467 online survey respondents living in the metropolitan areas of Los Angeles, Dallas/Fort Worth, and Atlanta in the United States to investigate three potential mechanisms through which greater public charging station density could shape BEV adoption intent. These three potential mechanisms are lower range anxiety, lower perceived mobility restriction, and more positive pro-BEV subjective norms. Multiple regression with ordinary least squares is used to investigate associations between charging station density and adoption intent. Multiple mediation analysis is then used to evaluate the three potential mechanisms for impact of charging station density on BEV adoption intent, and indicates that greater perceived subjective norms in support of BEVs explain much of the association between charger density and adoption intent. Range anxiety plays a smaller and less robust role as a mechanism, while perceived mobility restriction has no direct or indirect effect on BEV adoption intent. That is, we found no indication that BEV adoption intent is influenced by expectations that BEVs are unable to meet mobility needs. Findings indicate that norms are particularly important for investments in charging infrastructure to translate to more BEVs on the road.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, Global EV Outlook 2020, P276
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, ALT FUEL STAT LOC
  • [4] What drives the Pioneers? Applying lifestyle theory to early electric vehicle buyers in Canada
    Axsen, Jonn
    Cairns, Josh
    Dusyk, Nichole
    Goldberg, Suzanne
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 44 : 17 - 30
  • [5] Confusion of innovations: Mainstream consumer perceptions and misperceptions of electric-drive vehicles and charging programs in Canada
    Axsen, Jonn
    Langman, Brad
    Goldberg, Suzanne
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 27 : 163 - 173
  • [6] A self-identity based model of electric car adoption intention: A cross-cultural comparative study
    Barbarossa, Camilla
    Beckmann, Suzanne C.
    De Pelsmacker, Patrick
    Moons, Ingrid
    Gwozdz, Wencke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 42 : 149 - 160
  • [7] Still underdetected - Social norms and collective efficacy predict the acceptance of electric vehicles in Germany
    Barth, Markus
    Jugert, Philipp
    Fritsche, Immo
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2016, 37 : 64 - 77
  • [8] Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites
    Carley, Sanya
    Krause, Rachel M.
    Lane, Bradley W.
    Graham, John D.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 18 : 39 - 45
  • [9] Costello A. B., 2005, Pract. Assess. Res. Eval, V10, P1, DOI DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868
  • [10] Questionable research practices when using confirmatory factor analysis
    Crede, Marcus
    Harms, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 34 (01) : 18 - 30