Prognostic relevance of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, and LDH kinetics in patients treated with palliative second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

被引:44
作者
Haas, Michael [1 ]
Laubender, Ruediger P. [2 ]
Stieber, Petra [3 ]
Holdenrieder, Stefan [3 ]
Bruns, Christiane J. [4 ]
Wilkowski, Ralf [5 ]
Mansmann, Ulrich [2 ]
Heinemann, Volker [1 ]
Boeck, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med 3, Klinikum Grosshadern, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Dept Clin Chem, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Dept Surg, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[5] Klin Bad Trissl, Dept Radiotherapy & Radiooncol, Oberaudorf, Germany
关键词
Biomarker; Kinetics; Pancreatic cancer; Second-line chemotherapy; GEMCITABINE; SURVIVAL; CHEMOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; CAPECITABINE; ERLOTINIB; CA19-9; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s13277-010-0044-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to define prognostic serum biomarkers that could serve as surrogate survival endpoints during second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. This retrospective single-center study included patients treated with second-line therapy for advanced exocrine pancreatic cancer. A pretreatment value and at least one serial measurement during the first two cycles of second-line chemotherapy for CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, and LDH had to be available in order to evaluate the prognostic role of kinetics on overall survival. A cutoff of a >20% increase from baseline during treatment was defined in order to form groups with suspected different outcomes. The effect of serial biomarker changes on survival was modeled by Cox proportional hazards regression in univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall, 70 patients treated with second-line therapy for advanced disease were included; 94% had distant metastases at treatment initiation. Median time to progression was 2.7 months and median survival 5.4 months. Univariate analysis found that an increase of >20% during treatment was significantly associated with a worse overall survival for CA 19-9 (HR 2.00, p=0.018), CEA (HR 2.38, p=0.004), and CRP (HR 3.06, p<0.001). These associations remained significant within multivariate analysis for CEA (HR 2.86, p=0.001) and CRP (HR 3.20, p=0.001). Serum biomarker kinetics might serve as useful prognostic tools during second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 357
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL BY TUMOR RESPONSE [J].
ANDERSON, JR ;
CAIN, KC ;
GELBER, RD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 1 (11) :710-719
[2]   Postresection CA 19-9 Predicts Overall Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Chemoradiation: A Prospective Validation by RTOG 9704 [J].
Berger, Adam C. ;
Garcia, Miguel, Jr. ;
Hoffman, John P. ;
Regine, William F. ;
Abrams, Ross A. ;
Safran, Howard ;
Konski, Andre ;
Benson, Alan B., III ;
MacDonald, John ;
Willett, Christopher G. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (36) :5918-5922
[3]   The role of second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [J].
Boeck, Stefan ;
Heinemann, Volker .
FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2008, 4 (01) :41-50
[4]   Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [J].
Boeck, Stefan ;
Wilkowski, Ralf ;
Bruns, Christiane J. ;
Issels, Rolf D. ;
Schulz, Christoph ;
Moosmann, Nicolas ;
Laessig, Dorit ;
Haas, Michael ;
Golf, Alexander ;
Heinemann, Volker .
ONCOLOGY, 2007, 73 (3-4) :221-227
[5]   PANCREATIC AND AMPULLARY CARCINOMA - ULTRASOUND, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
BRAMBS, HJ ;
CLAUSSEN, CD .
ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 25 (01) :58-68
[6]   Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial [J].
Burris, HA ;
Moore, MJ ;
Andersen, J ;
Green, MR ;
Rothenberg, ML ;
Madiano, MR ;
Cripps, MC ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Storniolo, AM ;
Tarassoff, P ;
Nelson, R ;
Dorr, FA ;
Stephens, CD ;
VanHoff, DD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) :2403-2413
[7]  
Buyse M, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P2797, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961230)15:24<2797::AID-SIM290>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-V
[9]   Phase III Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Cunningham, David ;
Chau, Ian ;
Stocken, Deborah D. ;
Valle, Juan W. ;
Smith, David ;
Steward, William ;
Harper, Peter G. ;
Dunn, Janet ;
Tudur-Smith, Catrin ;
West, Julia ;
Falk, Stephen ;
Crellin, Adrian ;
Adab, Fawzi ;
Thompson, Joyce ;
Leonard, Pauline ;
Ostrowski, Joe ;
Eatock, Martin ;
Scheithauer, Werner ;
Herrmann, Richard ;
Neoptolemos, John P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (33) :5513-5518
[10]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247