Comparison of volatile constituents extracted from model grape juice and model wine by stir bar sorptive extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

被引:20
作者
Caven-Quantrill, Darren J. [2 ,3 ]
Buglass, Alan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Chem, Taejon 305701, South Korea
[2] Frutarom UK Ltd, Wellingborough NN8 2RN, Northants, England
[3] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England
关键词
Stir bar sorptive extraction; Thermal desorption; Volatile organic compounds; Model wine; SOLID-PHASE MICROEXTRACTION; OFF-FLAVOR; VARIETIES; SBSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.078
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) method coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was optimised for the analysis of volatile components of a model wine, based on a previously optimised method used for analysis of the same components in model grape juice. The presence of ethanol in the model wine sample matrix resulted in decreased sensitivity of the method toward most of the volatile constituents. Mean percent relative recoveries and reproducibilities (%CV) were 22.8% and 7.1%, respectively, compared with 28.4% and 8.5% for model grape juice. The mean limit of detection CLOD) ratio (juice:wine) was 0.25. Similar sensitivities for the two sample matrices using this method were achieved by changing the split ratio from 20:1 (grape juice) to 5:1 (wine), giving a mean limit of detection ratio (juice:wine) of 1.0, thus allowing direct comparison of chromatograms of volatile components in the two matrices. This enabled direct comparisons of grape juices and the wines derived from them by alcoholic yeast fermentation. The influence of ethanol concentration in the range 9-15% on method sensitivity is discussed, using an overlay of the total ion chromatograms. The use of a gas saver device for the 5:1 split ratio analysis of desorbed model wine aroma compounds is discussed in terms of preventing extraneous reaction of sorbent and stationary phases with air during analysis. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 881
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Characterization of the aroma profile of Madeira wine by sorptive extraction techniques [J].
Alves, RF ;
Nascimento, AMD ;
Nogueira, JMF .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2005, 546 (01) :11-21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, INL CAP GAS CHROM US
[3]  
[Anonymous], IN HOUS METH VAL GUI
[4]  
Baltussen E, 1999, J MICROCOLUMN SEP, V11, P737, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(1999)11:10<737::AID-MCS7>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-4
[6]  
Burdock G.A., 2001, FENAROLIS HDB FLAVOR, V4th(
[7]   Comparison of micro-scale simultaneous distillation-extraction and stir bar sorptive extraction for the determination of volatile organic constituents of grape juice [J].
Caven-Quantrill, Darren J. ;
Buglass, Alan J. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1117 (02) :121-131
[8]   Quantification approach for assessment of sparkling wine volatiles from different soils, ripening stages, and varieties by stir bar sorptive extraction with liquid desorption [J].
Coelho, Elisabete ;
Coimbra, Manuel A. ;
Nogueira, J. M. F. ;
Rocha, Silvia M. .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 635 (02) :214-221
[9]   Stir bar sorptive extraction for trace analysis [J].
David, Frank ;
Sandra, Pat .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1152 (1-2) :54-69
[10]   Analysis of volatiles of malt whisky by solid-phase microextraction and stir bar sorptive extraction [J].
Demyttenaere, JCR ;
Martínez, JIS ;
Verhé, R ;
Sandra, P ;
De Kimpe, N .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 985 (1-2) :221-232