Oral peanut immunotherapy in children with peanut anaphylaxis

被引:308
|
作者
Blumchen, Katharina [1 ]
Ulbricht, Helen [1 ]
Staden, Ute [1 ]
Dobberstein, Kerstin [1 ]
Beschorner, John [1 ]
de Oliveira, Lucila Camargo Lopes [1 ]
Shreffler, Wayne G. [2 ]
Sampson, Hugh A. [2 ]
Niggemann, Bodo [1 ]
Wahn, Ulrich [1 ]
Beyer, Kirsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Charite, Dept Pediat Pneumol & Immunol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
Allergy; anaphylaxis; children; food; oral immunotherapy; peanut; specific oral tolerance induction; tolerance; TOLERANCE INDUCTION; NATURAL-HISTORY; MURINE MODEL; NUT ALLERGY; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; DESENSITIZATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.030
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The only treatment option for peanut allergy is strict avoidance. Objective: To investigate efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) in peanut allergy. Methods: Twenty-three children (age, 3.2-14.3 years) with IgE-mediated peanut allergy confirmed by positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) received OIT following a rush protocol with roasted peanut for 7 days. If a protective dose of at least 0.5 g peanut was not achieved, patients continued with a long-term buildup protocol using biweekly dose increases up to at least 0.5 g peanut. A maintenance phase for 8 weeks was followed by 2 weeks of peanut avoidance and a final DBPCFC. Immunologic parameters were determined. Results: After OIT using the rush protocol, patients tolerated a median dose of only 0.15 g peanut. Twenty-two of 23 patients continued with the long-term protocol. After a median of 7 months, 14 patients reached the protective dose. At the final DBPCFC, patients tolerated a median of 1 g (range, 0.25-4 g) in comparison with 0.19 g peanut at the DBPCFC before OIT (range, 0.02-1 g). In 2.6% of 6137 total daily doses, mild to moderate side effects were observed; in 1.3%, symptoms of pulmonary obstruction were detected. OIT was discontinued in 4 of 22 patients because of adverse events. There was a significant increase in peanut-specific serum IgG4 and a decrease in peanut-specific IL-5, IL-4, and IL-2 production by PBMCs after OIT. Conclusion: Long-term OIT appears to be safe and of some benefit in many patients with peanut allergy. With an increase in threshold levels and a reduction of peanut-specific T(H)2 cytokine production, the induction of tolerance may be feasible in some patients. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126:83-91.)
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Peanut oral immunotherapy is not ready for clinical use
    Thyagarajan, Ananth
    Varshney, Pooja
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Sicherer, Scott
    Wood, Robert
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Sampson, Hugh
    Burks, A. Wesley
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 126 (01) : 31 - 32
  • [22] Sustained successful peanut oral immunotherapy associated with low basophil activation and peanut-specific IgE
    Tsai, Mindy
    Mukai, Kaori
    Chinthrajah, R. Sharon
    Nadeau, Kari C.
    Galli, Stephen J.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 145 (03) : 885 - +
  • [23] A Practical, Stepwise Approach to Peanut Oral Immunotherapy in Clinical Practice: Benefits and Risks
    Anagnostou, Aikaterini
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA AND ALLERGY, 2021, 14 : 277 - 285
  • [24] Emerging developments in the forefront of peanut oral immunotherapy
    Pepper, Amber N.
    Sriaroon, Panida
    Casale, Thomas B.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 21 (03) : 263 - 268
  • [25] Exploratory immunogenicity outcomes of peanut oral immunotherapy: Findings from the PALISADE trial
    Nilsson, Caroline
    Vereda, Andrea
    Borres, Magnus P.
    Andersson, Mats
    Sodergren, Eva
    Rudengren, Magnus
    Smith, Alex
    Simon, Reyna J.
    Ryan, Robert
    Fernandez-Rivas, Montserrat
    Adelman, Daniel
    Vickery, Brian P.
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [26] Transitioning peanut oral immunotherapy to clinical practice
    Lazizi, S.
    Labrosse, R.
    Graham, F.
    FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY, 2022, 3
  • [27] Current opinion and review on peanut oral immunotherapy
    Deol, Sharon
    Bird, J. Andrew
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2014, 10 (10) : 3017 - 3021
  • [28] Investigation of peanut oral immunotherapy with CpG/peanut nanoparticles in a murine model of peanut allergy
    Srivastava, Kamal D.
    Siefert, Alyssa
    Fahmy, Tarek M.
    Caplan, Michael J.
    Li, Xiu-Min
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 138 (02) : 536 - +
  • [29] Adverse events associated with peanut oral immunotherapy in children - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grzeskowiak, Luke E.
    Tao, Billy
    Knight, Emma
    Cohen-Woods, Sarah
    Chataway, Timothy
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [30] Two-year post-treatment outcomes following peanut oral immunotherapy in the Probiotic and Peanut Oral Immunotherapy-003 Long-Term (PPOIT-003LT) study
    Loke, Paxton
    Wang, Xiaofang
    Lloyd, Melanie
    Ashley, Sarah E.
    Lozinsky, Adriana C.
    Gold, Michael
    O'Sullivan, Michael D.
    Quinn, Patrick
    Robinson, Marnie
    Galvin, Audrey Dunn
    Orsini, Francesca
    Tang, Mimi L. K.
    ALLERGY, 2024, 79 (10) : 2759 - 2774