Oral peanut immunotherapy in children with peanut anaphylaxis

被引:308
|
作者
Blumchen, Katharina [1 ]
Ulbricht, Helen [1 ]
Staden, Ute [1 ]
Dobberstein, Kerstin [1 ]
Beschorner, John [1 ]
de Oliveira, Lucila Camargo Lopes [1 ]
Shreffler, Wayne G. [2 ]
Sampson, Hugh A. [2 ]
Niggemann, Bodo [1 ]
Wahn, Ulrich [1 ]
Beyer, Kirsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Charite, Dept Pediat Pneumol & Immunol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
Allergy; anaphylaxis; children; food; oral immunotherapy; peanut; specific oral tolerance induction; tolerance; TOLERANCE INDUCTION; NATURAL-HISTORY; MURINE MODEL; NUT ALLERGY; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; DESENSITIZATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.030
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The only treatment option for peanut allergy is strict avoidance. Objective: To investigate efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) in peanut allergy. Methods: Twenty-three children (age, 3.2-14.3 years) with IgE-mediated peanut allergy confirmed by positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) received OIT following a rush protocol with roasted peanut for 7 days. If a protective dose of at least 0.5 g peanut was not achieved, patients continued with a long-term buildup protocol using biweekly dose increases up to at least 0.5 g peanut. A maintenance phase for 8 weeks was followed by 2 weeks of peanut avoidance and a final DBPCFC. Immunologic parameters were determined. Results: After OIT using the rush protocol, patients tolerated a median dose of only 0.15 g peanut. Twenty-two of 23 patients continued with the long-term protocol. After a median of 7 months, 14 patients reached the protective dose. At the final DBPCFC, patients tolerated a median of 1 g (range, 0.25-4 g) in comparison with 0.19 g peanut at the DBPCFC before OIT (range, 0.02-1 g). In 2.6% of 6137 total daily doses, mild to moderate side effects were observed; in 1.3%, symptoms of pulmonary obstruction were detected. OIT was discontinued in 4 of 22 patients because of adverse events. There was a significant increase in peanut-specific serum IgG4 and a decrease in peanut-specific IL-5, IL-4, and IL-2 production by PBMCs after OIT. Conclusion: Long-term OIT appears to be safe and of some benefit in many patients with peanut allergy. With an increase in threshold levels and a reduction of peanut-specific T(H)2 cytokine production, the induction of tolerance may be feasible in some patients. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126:83-91.)
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 91
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Management of Anaphylaxis During Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
    Szafron, Vibha
    Anagnostou, Aikaterini
    CURRENT ALLERGY AND ASTHMA REPORTS, 2023, 23 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [2] Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy
    Hofmann, Alison M.
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Palmer, Kricia P.
    Lokhnygina, Yuliya
    Steele, Pamela H.
    Kamilaris, Janet
    Burks, A. Wesley
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 124 (02) : 286 - 291
  • [3] Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
    Anagnostou, Katherine
    Clark, Andrew
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, VOL 67, 2016, 67 : 375 - 385
  • [4] Low-dose oral immunotherapy for children with anaphylactic peanut allergy in Japan
    Nagakura, Ken-ichi
    Yanagida, Noriyuki
    Sato, Sakura
    Nishino, Makoto
    Asaumi, Tomoyuki
    Ogura, Kiyotake
    Ebisawa, Motohiro
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 29 (05) : 512 - 518
  • [5] Peanut Oral Immunotherapy State of the Art
    Tang, Mimi L. K.
    Lozinsky, Adriana C.
    Loke, Paxton
    IMMUNOLOGY AND ALLERGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 40 (01) : 97 - +
  • [6] Oral Immunotherapy in Japanese Children with Anaphylactic Peanut Allergy
    Nagakura, Ken-ichi
    Sato, Sakura
    Yanagida, Noriyuki
    Nishino, Makoto
    Asaumi, Tomoyuki
    Ogura, Kiyotake
    Ebisawa, Motohiro
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 175 (03) : 181 - 188
  • [7] Longitudinal antibody responses to peanut following probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy in children with peanut allergy
    Hsiao, Kuang-Chih
    Ponsonby, Anne-Louise
    Ashley, Sarah
    Lee, Cassandra Yuen Yan
    Jindal, Lalita
    Tang, Mimi L. K.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2022, 52 (06) : 735 - 746
  • [8] Sustained unresponsiveness to peanut in subjects who have completed peanut oral immunotherapy
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Kulis, Michael
    Steele, Pamela H.
    Kamilaris, Janet
    Berglund, Jelena P.
    Burk, Caitlin
    Hiegel, Anne
    Carlisle, Suzanna
    Christie, Lynn
    Perry, Tamara T.
    Pesek, Robbie D.
    Sheikh, Saira
    Virkud, Yamini
    Smith, P. Brian
    Shamji, Mohamed H.
    Durham, Stephen R.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Burks, A. Wesley
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 133 (02) : 468 - +
  • [9] Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: The con argument
    Fiocchi, Alessandro
    Artesani, Maria Cristina
    Fierro, Vincenzo
    Riccardi, Carla
    Dahdah, Lamia
    Mennini, Maurizio
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (08):
  • [10] Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: Is It Ready for Clinical Practice?
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2013, 1 (01) : 15 - 21