Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity

被引:31
|
作者
Than, Khoi D. [1 ]
Mummaneni, Praveen V. [4 ]
Bridges, Kelly J. [1 ]
Tran, Stacie [2 ]
Park, Paul [3 ]
Chou, Dean [4 ]
La Marca, Frank [5 ]
Uribe, Juan S. [6 ]
Vogel, Todd D. [7 ]
Nunley, Pierce D. [8 ]
Eastlack, Robert K. [9 ]
Anand, Neel [10 ]
Okonkwo, David O. [11 ]
Kanter, Adam S. [11 ]
Mundis, Gregory M., Jr. [9 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Mail Code CH8N,3303 SW Bond Ave, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] San Diego Ctr Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurosurg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Neurosurg, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Barrow Neurol Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
[7] Great Lakes Neurosurg Associates, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[8] Spine Inst Louisiana, Shreveport, LA USA
[9] Scripps Clin Med Grp, Div Orthopaed Surg, La Jolla, CA USA
[10] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Orthoped, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[11] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurol Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
minimally invasive spine surgery; complications; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; lateral lumbar interbody fusion; adult spinal deformity; percutaneous instrumentation; LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT RELEASE; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; LUMBAR FUSION; POSTERIOR; SURGERY; METAANALYSIS; INFECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17479
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE High-quality studies that compare outcomes of open and minimally invasively placed pedicle screws for adult spinal deformity are needed. Therefore, the authors compared differences in complications from a circumferential minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery and those from a hybrid surgery. METHODS A retrospective review of a multicenter database of patients with spinal deformity who were treated with an MIS surgery was performed. Database inclusion criteria included an age of = 18 years and at least 1 of the following: a coronal Cobb angle of > 20 degrees, a sagittal vertical axis of > 5 cm, a pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis angle of > 10 degrees, and/or a pelvic tilt of > 20 degrees. Patients were propensity matched according to the levels instrumented. RESULTS In this database, a complete data set was available for 165 patients, and after those who underwent 3-column osteotomy were excluded, 137 patients were available for analysis; 76 patients remained after propensity matching (MIS surgery group 38 patients, hybrid surgery group 38 patients). The authors found no difference in demographics, number of levels instrumented, or preoperative and postoperative radiographic results. At least 1 complication was suffered by 55.3% of patients in the hybrid surgery group and 44.7% of those in the MIS surgery group (p = 0.359). Patients in the MIS surgery group had significantly fewer neurological, operative, and minor complications than those in the hybrid surgery group. The reoperation rates in both groups were similar. The most common complication category for the MIS surgery group was radiographic and for the hybrid surgery group was neurological. Patients in both groups experienced postoperative improvement in their Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores (all p < 0.05); however, MIS surgery provided a greater reduction in leg pain according to VAS scores. CONCLUSIONS Overall complication rates in the MIS and hybrid surgery groups were similar. MIS surgery resulted in significantly fewer neurological, operative, and minor complications. Reoperation rates in the 2 groups were similar, and despite complications, the patients reported significant improvement in their pain and function.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbosacral Spine Degenerative Diseases. A Retrospective Database of 40 Consecutive Cases and Literature Review
    Millimaggi, Daniele Francesco
    di Norcia, Valerio
    Luzzi, Sabino
    Alfiero, Tommaso
    Galzio, Renato Juan
    Ricci, Alessandro
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 28 (03) : 454 - 461
  • [32] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Undergoing Revision Fusion: Clinical Outcome Comparison
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 : E1208 - E1218
  • [33] Mini-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Augmented by Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes in Adult Low-grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Kang, Byung-Uk
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Jung, Byungjoo
    Choi, Young-Geun
    Jeon, Sang Hyeop
    Lee, Ho Yeon
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 22 (02): : 114 - 121
  • [34] Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin, Chun-Hao
    Wu, Yu-Jie
    Chang, Chiao-Wei
    Tam, Ka-Wai
    Loh, El-Wui
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2025, 145 (01)
  • [35] Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation is Associated with Reduced Cost and Similar Outcomes in Selected Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for L4-5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Eliades, Philip
    Rahal, Jason P.
    Herrick, Daniel B.
    Corliss, Brian M.
    Riesenburger, Ron
    Hwang, Steven
    Kryzanski, James T.
    CUREUS, 2015, 7 (02):
  • [36] Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Kwon, Ji-Won
    Park, Yung
    Lee, Byung Ho
    Yoon, So Ra
    Ha, Joong-Won
    Kim, Hyunkyo
    Suk, Kyung-Soo
    Moon, Seong-Hwan
    Kim, Hak-Sun
    Lee, Hwan-Mo
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (11) : 773 - 780
  • [37] Acute Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Interbody Fusion Data From a US National Database With 6106 Patients
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Lerner, Jason
    Lesko, James
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2012, 25 (06): : 324 - 328
  • [38] Reoperation Rates Due to Adjacent Segment Disease Following Primary 1 to 2-Level Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Galetta, Matthew S.
    Lorentz, Nathan A.
    Lan, Rae
    Chan, Calvin
    Zabat, Michelle A.
    Raman, Tina
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
    Fischer, Charla R.
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (18) : 1295 - 1299
  • [39] Comparison of Complications and Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Nonobese and Obese Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Park, Paul
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Nguyen, Stacie
    Mundis, Gregory M., Jr.
    La Marca, Frank
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Anand, Neel
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Fessler, Richard
    Eastlack, Robert K.
    Chou, Dean
    Deviren, Vedat
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 87 : 55 - 60
  • [40] Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients
    Lau, Darryl
    Khan, Adam
    Terman, Samuel W.
    Yee, Timothy
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)