Correlation between extreme drug resistance assay and response to primary paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

被引:40
作者
Eltabbakh, GH
Piver, MS
Hempling, RE
Recio, FO
Lele, SB
Marchetti, DL
Baker, TR
Blumenson, LE
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Fletcher Allen Hlth Care, Div Gynecol Oncol, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Biomath Facil, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1998.5109
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. The extreme drug resistance (EDR) assay has been correlated with failure of response to chemotherapy in greater than 99% of patients. The goal of this study is to correlate the results of the EDR assay to response to first-line paclitaxel/cisplatin among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods. Seventy-five of 100 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer for whom EDR assay war, performed were treated with weekly induction cisplatin (1 mg/kg body wt) x 4, followed by monthly paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) x 6 and were evaluable for correlation of response to chemotherapy and EDR assay. Specimens for EDR assay were obtained at primary surgery and the EDR assay was performed by Oncotech, Inc. Response to chemotherapy was correlated to EDR assay results regarding paclitaxel and cisplatin. Results, Among 75 evaluable patients, the prevalence of EDR to paclitaxel was 20.0% (n = 15) and to cisplatin it was 2.7% (n = 2). Only 1 patient (1.3%) exhibited EDR to both paclitaxel and cisplatin. Surgical assessment of response was performed in 42 patients; 33 patients were clinically evaluable. The overall response rate was 85.3%. The overall response rate for patients whose tumors demonstrated no EDR to either paclitaxel or cisplatin did not differ significantly from that for patients whose tumors demonstrated EDR to at least one of these two drugs (86.4% versus 81.3%, respectively, P = 0.692), Similarly, the complete surgical response rate for both groups did not differ significantly (25.4% versus 12.5%, respectively, P = 0.34). A single patient whose tumor exhibited EDR to both paclitaxel and cisplatin had tumor progression. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the EDR assay were 79.6, 27.0, 86.0, and 19.0%, respectively, Conclusions. EDR to paclitaxel does not preclude response to the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin as primary therapy for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. The role of the EDR assay in the primary management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer remains to be determined. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 397
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], APPL STAT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1979, HDB REP RES CANC TRE
  • [3] BOSENQUET AG, 1991, LANCET, V337, P711
  • [4] Brown E, 1996, CANCER, V77, P1020, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960315)77:6<1020::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-L
  • [6] *CANC COMM INT FED, 1986, GYNECOL ONCOL, V25, P383
  • [7] PRIMARY BIOASSAY OF HUMAN TUMOR STEM-CELLS
    HAMBURGER, AW
    SALMON, SE
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1977, 197 (4302) : 461 - 463
  • [8] COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY TESTED IN A SHORT-TERM THYMIDINE INCORPORATION ASSAY IN PRIMARY CULTURES OF OVARIAN ADENOCARCINOMAS
    HAYWARD, IP
    HURST, T
    PARSONS, PG
    KHOO, SK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CELL CLONING, 1992, 10 (03): : 182 - 189
  • [9] HIGHLY SPECIFIC PREDICTION OF ANTINEOPLASTIC DRUG-RESISTANCE WITH AN INVITRO ASSAY USING SUPRAPHARMACOLOGIC DRUG EXPOSURES
    KERN, DH
    WEISENTHAL, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1990, 82 (07) : 582 - 588
  • [10] Kern DH, 1997, CANCER, V79, P1447, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970401)79:7<1447::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO