A new approach for applied nutritional models: Computing parameters of dynamic mechanistic growth models using genorne-wide prediction

被引:1
作者
Freua, Mateus Castelani [1 ]
de Almeida Santana, Miguel Henrique [1 ]
Sterman Ferraz, Jose Bento [1 ]
机构
[1] Fac Zootecnia & Engn Alimentos USP, Dept Vet Med, Av Duque de Caxias Norte 225, BR-13635900 Pirassununga, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Beef cattle; Genomic prediction; GWAS; Mechanistic modeling; Performance; GENOMIC BREEDING VALUES; RESIDUAL FEED-INTAKE; SIMULATION-MODELS; EFFICIENCY; ACCURACY; REQUIREMENTS; SELECTION; CARCASS; TRAITS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2016.06.013
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Nutritional models have long been used as decision support tools by the livestock industry. Despite the advance of genomic prediction, these two disciplines have evolved separately. Because model parameters are responsible to describe between-animal variability, we propose an integration of nutritional models with genomics by means of such parameters. Two dynamic mechanistic models of cattle growth were used: Cornell Cattle Value Discovery System (CVDS) and Davis Growth Model (DGM). We estimated SNP marker effects for their parameters and also for observed phenotypes. Then, we compared what would be the best prediction scenario - model simulation with parameters computed from genomic data or genomic prediction directly on higher phenotypes. We found that genomic prediction on dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) are still a better approach than using CVDS for predictions. Dry matter required (DMR), a CVDS-predicted value for DMI had higher correlation (r=0.253) with observed DMI than results from genomic prediction (r=0.07). DGM had better predictive ability (r=038) than genomic prediction on ADG (r=0.098). This is also the case for whole-body protein (r=0.496) and fat at slaughter (r=0.505) whose predictions were better with DGM than genomic prediction performed on the observed traits (r=0.194 and r=0.183, respectively). When contrasting simulations with genomically predicted parameters to those with regularly computed ones, CVDS showed moderate correlation and low bias between simulations of DMR (r=0.966; b=0.9%) and ADG (r=0.645; b=5.5%). Although further model development is necessary, the DGM with subject-specific parameters computed from genotypic data was a better option for predicting phenotypes than genomic prediction alone. In addition, simulations with genomically and regularly computed parameters match at a reasonable extend. This is the main argument to call attention from the research community that our approach may pave the way for the development of a new generation of applied nutritional models, especially towards individual-based simulations with subject-specific parameters computed from genomic information. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 135
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Liver transcriptomic networks reveal main biological processes associated with feed efficiency in beef cattle [J].
Alexandre, Pamela A. ;
Kogelman, Lisette J. A. ;
Santana, Miguel H. A. ;
Passarelli, Danielle ;
Pulz, Lidia H. ;
Fantinato-Neto, Paulo ;
Silva, Paulo L. ;
Leme, Paulo R. ;
Strefezzi, Ricardo F. ;
Coutinho, Luiz L. ;
Ferraz, Jose B. S. ;
Eler, Joanie P. ;
Kadarmideen, Haja N. ;
Fukumasu, Heidge .
BMC GENOMICS, 2015, 16
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ELEMENT COMPUT SYST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, VSeventh, DOI DOI 10.17226/9791
[4]   Using ultrasound measurements to predict body composition of yearling bulls [J].
Baker, M. J. ;
Tedeschi, L. O. ;
Fox, D. G. ;
Henning, W. R. ;
Ketchen, D. J. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 (10) :2666-2672
[5]   CELL BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: Genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle [J].
Berry, D. P. ;
Crowley, J. J. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (04) :1594-1613
[6]   Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle [J].
Bolormaa, S. ;
Pryce, J. E. ;
Kemper, K. ;
Savin, K. ;
Hayes, B. J. ;
Barendse, W. ;
Zhang, Y. ;
Reich, C. M. ;
Mason, B. A. ;
Bunch, R. J. ;
Harrison, B. E. ;
Reverter, A. ;
Herd, R. M. ;
Tier, B. ;
Graser, H. -U. ;
Goddard, M. E. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (07) :3088-3104
[7]   Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle [J].
Chen, L. ;
Schenkel, F. ;
Vinsky, M. ;
Crews, D. H., Jr. ;
Li, C. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (10) :4669-4678
[8]   A meta-analysis of energy and protein requirements for maintenance and growth of Nellore cattle [J].
Chizzotti, M. L. ;
Tedeschi, L. O. ;
Valadares-Filho, S. C. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 86 (07) :1588-1597
[9]   Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach [J].
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
Villanueva, Beatriz ;
Woolliams, John A. .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (10)
[10]   Ridge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrBLUP [J].
Endelman, Jeffrey B. .
PLANT GENOME, 2011, 4 (03) :250-255