Policy analysis of a government-sanctioned management plan for a community-owned forest in Romania

被引:7
作者
Sandulescu, Emil [2 ]
Wagner, John E. [1 ]
Pailler, Sharon [3 ]
Floyd, Donald W. [4 ]
Davis, Craig J. [3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Fac Forest & Nat Resources Management, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[2] IKEA Supply AG, Bucharest, Romania
[3] SUNY Syracuse, ESF Fac Forest & Nat Resources Management, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[4] Univ New Brunswick, Fac Forestry & Environm Management, Canadian Inst Forest Policy & Commun, Fredericton, NB, Canada
关键词
forest management; sustained yield; policy analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2007.01.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Forest management in Romania is based on sustained yield. However, the cur-rent sustained-yield policy may be outdated and may not be the best way of achieving Romania's intended objectives of biological sustainability and community stability. The existing policy also does not incorporate objectives consistent with Romania's new economic and social systems. We examine the potential economic net benefits from timber harvests that could result from changes to the existing sustained-yield policy by comparing the state-approved management plan of a community forest with three alternative forest management plans. We find that the three alternatives appreciably increase the potential economic net benefits. Certain aspects of these alternative plans deviate from Romania's current sustained-yield criteria; however, the costs associated with changes to the current regime could be balanced by the economic net benefits of implementing an alternative management plan. To employ the same static forest management policy throughout time without adapting to a dynamic socio-economic environment will likely lead to inefficient, ineffective, and unproductive utilization of Romania's forest resources. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 24
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STUMPED FOREST IND T
[2]   Forest landscape management modeling using simulated annealing [J].
Baskent, EZ ;
Jordan, GA .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 165 (1-3) :29-45
[3]  
Boston K, 2002, FOREST SCI, V48, P35
[4]   Discount rate and harvest policy: implications for Baltic forestry [J].
Brukas, V ;
Thorsen, BJ ;
Helles, F ;
Tarp, P .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2001, 2 (02) :143-156
[5]  
CLAWSON M, 1975, FORESTS WHOM WHAT RE
[6]  
Davis LS, 2001, FOREST MANAGEMENT
[7]  
DUERR WA, 1971, SOCIAL SCI FORESTRY, P30
[8]   European forest ecosystems:: building the future on the legacy of the past [J].
Farrell, EP ;
Führer, E ;
Ryan, D ;
Andersson, F ;
Hüttl, R ;
Piussi, P .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 132 (01) :5-20
[9]  
Field BarryC., 2002, ENV EC INTRO
[10]  
*FMP, 2003, FOR MAN PLAN MAG ILV