Using real options model based on Monte-Carlo Least-Squares for economic appraisal of flexibility for electricity generation with VVER-1000 in developing countries

被引:12
作者
Najafi, P. [1 ]
Talebi, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Energy Engn & Phys, Tehran Polytech, 424 Hafez Ave,POB 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Real Options Theory; Flexibility options; Nuclear economics; Irreversible investment; Monte-Carlo; POWER-PLANTS; INVESTMENT; UNCERTAINTY; REACTORS; SMR;
D O I
10.1016/j.seta.2021.101508
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper aims to measure managerial flexibility value in deferring the investment of deployment. VVER-1000 nuclear power plants (NPPs) in developing countries. A methodology based on the Monte-Carlo simulation and adapting the backward dynamic least-squares programming is implemented to build a RealOptions-Valuation (ROV) framework. The influence of five uncertain market factors, including the risk-adjusted ratio; the expiration date of the option; the specific cost of capital investment; the volatility, and the drift rate of the market price of electricity, on the optimum investment timing and the exercise value of the deferral-option is studied. Results indicate that despite the preliminary analysis with the traditional DiscountedCash-Flow (DCF) investment appraisal tool, the ROV method provides attractive opportunities for decision-makers to analyze and capture the embedded possible real-options and upside potential risks managerial decisions by keeping the investment option alive and postponing investment for options maturity. Finally, performing a sensitivity analysis highlights that extending the validity period for investment in irreversible nuclear electricity generation with VVER-1000 in developing countries, which experience electricity-price volatility rate higher than 20% up to 11 years, could turn the investment project more economically attractive.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, OP EXP NUCL POW STAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Compendium of MS4 Permitting Approaches, P1, DOI [10.2172/784669, 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
[4]   Industrial electricity demand for Turkey: A structural time series analysis [J].
Dilaver, Zafer ;
Hunt, Lester C. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (03) :426-436
[5]  
Fernandez P., 2001, BENCHMARKING, V8, P281, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14635770110403783, 10.1108/14635770110403783]
[6]   Evaluating the enhanced flexibility of lignite-fired power plants: A real options analysis [J].
Glensk, Barbara ;
Madlener, Reinhard .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 177 :737-749
[7]   Choice of nuclear power investments under price uncertainty: Valuing modularity [J].
Gollier, C ;
Proult, D ;
Thais, F ;
Walgenwitz, G .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (04) :667-685
[8]  
Gurkan K, 2012, CONTEXT
[9]  
IAEA, 2000, DEC WWER TYP NUCL PO
[10]  
IAEA I, 2013, TOOLKIT NUCL DESALIN