Differences in Research Literacy in Educational Science Depending on Study Program and University

被引:0
作者
Ophoff, Gross Jana [1 ]
Schladitz, Sandra [2 ]
Wirtz, Markus [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Educ Freiburg, Inst Educ Sci, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Dept Psychol, Marburg, Germany
[3] Univ Educ Freiburg, Inst Psychol, Freiburg, Germany
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HEAD'17 - 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION ADVANCES | 2017年
关键词
Educational Research Literacy; Educational Science; higher education research; competency tests; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.4995/HEAd17.2017.5556
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The ability to purposefully access, reflect on, and use evidence from educational research (Educational Research Literacy, ERL) are key competencies of future professionals in educational practice. Based on the conceptual framework presented in this paper, a test instrument was developed to assess ERL, consisting of the competence facets Information Literacy, Statistical Literacy, and Evidence-based Reasoning. This contribution aims to delve deeper into the question of whether Educational Science students differ in their overall ERL proficiency depending on their study program and university. This comparison is based on a large-scale study of 1,213 Educational Science students (Teacher Training and Educational Studies) at six German universities in the winter semester of 2012/13 and in the summer semester of 2013. The results indicate that students seem to profit from their studies at the different universities. Moreover, the ERL competence facets differentiate to some extent between universities and degree programs, which can serve as the starting point for curricular quality development measures. Subsequently, the results are critically discussed, and the desiderata for future research are stated, e.g., the identification of predictors that cause the reported differences.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1202
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], KOKOHS WORKING PAPER
  • [2] [Anonymous], PISA 2000 TECHNICAL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, EMPIRISCHE BILDUNGSF
  • [4] [Anonymous], STAND LEHR BILD BESC
  • [5] Barchfield P., 2009, INFORMAL LOG, V29, P396, DOI DOI 10.22329/il.v29i4.2906
  • [6] The continuing search to find a more effective and less intimidating way to teach research methods in higher education
    Bell, Robin
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 53 (03) : 285 - 295
  • [7] Blixrud J. C., 2003, PROJECT SAILS STANDA
  • [8] The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework: Assessing Scientific Reasoning
    Brown, Nathaniel J. S.
    Furtak, Erin Marie
    Timms, Michael
    Nagashima, Sam O.
    Wilson, Mark
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (3-4) : 123 - 141
  • [9] Going URB@N: exploring the impact of undergraduate students as pedagogic researchers
    Butcher, John
    Maunder, Rachel
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 51 (02) : 142 - 152
  • [10] Dunn D.S., 2008, TEACHING CRITICAL TH