Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing

被引:8
作者
Yang, Jing [1 ]
Chang, Hua-Hua [2 ]
Tao, Jian [1 ]
Shi, Ningzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Normal Univ, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
cognitive diagnostic assessment; computerized adaptive testing; nonparametric item selection method; stratification indices; MODELS; EFFICIENCY; CAT;
D O I
10.1177/0146621619893783
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT) aims to obtain more useful diagnostic information by taking advantages of computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) have been developed to classify examinees into the correct proficiency classes so as to get more efficient remediation, whereas CAT tailors optimal items to the examinee's mastery profile. The item selection method is the key factor of the CD-CAT procedure. In recent years, a large number of parametric/nonparametric item selection methods have been proposed. In this article, the authors proposed a series of stratified item selection methods in CD-CAT, which are combined with posterior-weighted Kullback-Leibler (PWKL), nonparametric item selection (NPS), and weighted nonparametric item selection (WNPS) methods, and named S-PWKL, S-NPS, and S-WNPS, respectively. Two different types of stratification indices were used: original versus novel. The performances of the proposed item selection methods were evaluated via simulation studies and compared with the PWKL, NPS, and WNPS methods without stratification. Manipulated conditions included calibration sample size, item quality, number of attributes, number of strata, and data generation models. Results indicated that the S-WNPS and S-NPS methods performed similarly, and both outperformed the S-PWKL method. And item selection methods with novel stratification indices performed slightly better than the ones with original stratification indices, and those without stratification performed the worst.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 361
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Handbook of item response theory: volume 3: applications
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], SKILL DIAGNOSIS THEO
[5]  
Chang H.-H., 2007, The Sage Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, V1, P170
[6]   A global information approach to computerized adoptive testing [J].
Chang, HH ;
Ying, ZL .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1996, 20 (03) :213-229
[7]   a-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing [J].
Chang, HH ;
Ying, ZL .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1999, 23 (03) :211-222
[8]   Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples [J].
Chang, Yuan-Pei ;
Chiu, Chia-Yi ;
Tsai, Rung-Ching .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2019, 43 (07) :543-561
[9]  
Cheng Y., 2008, COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIV
[10]   Improving Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing by Balancing Attribute Coverage: The Modified Maximum Global Discrimination Index Method [J].
Cheng, Ying .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 70 (06) :902-913