Annoyance response to low frequency noise with tonal components: A case study on transformer noise

被引:34
作者
Di, Guo-Qing [1 ]
Zhou, Xi-Xi [1 ]
Chen, Xing-Wang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Environm Pollut & Control Technol, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Annoyance; Low frequency noise; Tonal component; Acoustical factor; Prediction model; Transformer noise; COMMUNITY ANNOYANCE; AIRCRAFT NOISE; URBAN SOUNDSCAPES; SOUND; QUALITY; ENVIRONMENTS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.12.003
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In order to study how acoustical factors influence annoyance responses to low frequency noise with tonal components, this research has selected 220 kV and 500 kV transformer noises as examples and an 11-point numerical scale as an evaluation tool, in which the percentage of highly annoyed (%HA) and mean annoyance (MA) are chosen to represent annoyance caused by noises. Results show that a logistic curve is well suited for describing the exposure-response relationship between the A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level (LAN) and %HA (or MA) of the transformer noise. With the same LAN, 220 kV transformer noise is more annoying than 500 kV transformer noise in terms of %HA and MA, which is related to different sharpness, roughness and tonality of the noises caused by transformers of the two voltage levels. Based on stepwise regression analysis, multiple linear regression models are further developed by using LAN and roughness as acoustical parameters to predict the %HA and MA of transformer noise. Compared with the linear regression model that considered only LAN values, multiple linear regressions can efficiently account for the different annoyance ratings of the two transformer noises at the same LAN values. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Annoyance from industrial noise: Indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources [J].
Alayrac, M. ;
Marquis-Favre, C. ;
Viollon, S. ;
Morel, J. ;
Le Nost, G. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 128 (03) :1128-1139
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, PSYCHOACOUSTICS FACT, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-09562-1
[3]  
Backteman O., 1983, Journal of Low Frequency Noise & Vibration, V2, P1
[4]   Is a "pleasant" low-frequency noise also less annoying? [J].
Bengtsson, J .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2004, 277 (03) :535-537
[5]   Sources and effects of low-frequency noise [J].
Berglund, B ;
Hassmen, P ;
Job, RFS .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 99 (05) :2985-3002
[6]   Annoyance and spectral contrast are cues for similarity and preference of sounds [J].
Berglund, B ;
Hassmén, P ;
Preis, A .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2002, 250 (01) :53-64
[7]  
BRONER N, 1993, ASHRAE TRAN, V99, P1025
[8]  
Di GQ, 2005, J ENVIRON SCI-CHINA, V17, P135
[9]   Investigation of the relationship between aircraft noise and community annoyance in China [J].
Di Guoqing ;
Liu Xiaoyi ;
Shi Xiang ;
Li Zhengguang ;
Lin Qili .
NOISE & HEALTH, 2012, 14 (57) :52-57
[10]   Components in evaluation of complex interior truck sounds [J].
Genell, Anders ;
Vastfjall, Daniel ;
Kleiner, Mendel ;
Hedlund, Anders .
JOURNAL OF LOW FREQUENCY NOISE VIBRATION AND ACTIVE CONTROL, 2006, 25 (04) :227-237