Feature Selection and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Classification of Grazing and Rumination Behaviour in Sheep

被引:91
作者
Mansbridge, Nicola [1 ]
Mitsch, Jurgen [2 ,3 ]
Bollard, Nicola [1 ]
Ellis, Keith [4 ]
Miguel-Pacheco, Giuliana G. [1 ]
Dottorini, Tania [1 ]
Kaler, Jasmeet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Vet Med & Sci, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leics, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Comp Sci, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Adv Data Anal Ctr, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[4] Intel Labs, Internet Things Syst Res, Leixlip W23 CX68, Ireland
基金
“创新英国”项目; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
sheep behaviour; grazing; rumination behaviour; classification algorithm; accelerometer and gyroscope; sensor; machine learning; precision livestock monitoring; ACCELEROMETER; SYSTEM; RECOGNITION; MOTION;
D O I
10.3390/s18103532
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Grazing and ruminating are the most important behaviours for ruminants, as they spend most of their daily time budget performing these. Continuous surveillance of eating behaviour is an important means for monitoring ruminant health, productivity and welfare. However, surveillance performed by human operators is prone to human variance, time-consuming and costly, especially on animals kept at pasture or free-ranging. The use of sensors to automatically acquire data, and software to classify and identify behaviours, offers significant potential in addressing such issues. In this work, data collected from sheep by means of an accelerometer/gyroscope sensor attached to the ear and collar, sampled at 16 Hz, were used to develop classifiers for grazing and ruminating behaviour using various machine learning algorithms: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k nearest neighbour (kNN) and adaptive boosting (Adaboost). Multiple features extracted from the signals were ranked on their importance for classification. Several performance indicators were considered when comparing classifiers as a function of algorithm used, sensor localisation and number of used features. Random forest yielded the highest overall accuracies: 92% for collar and 91% for ear. Gyroscope-based features were shown to have the greatest relative importance for eating behaviours. The optimum number of feature characteristics to be incorporated into the model was 39, from both ear and collar data. The findings suggest that one can successfully classify eating behaviours in sheep with very high accuracy; this could be used to develop a device for automatic monitoring of feed intake in the sheep sector to monitor health and welfare.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] AN INTRODUCTION TO KERNEL AND NEAREST-NEIGHBOR NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION
    ALTMAN, NS
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1992, 46 (03) : 175 - 185
  • [2] Using a three-axis accelerometer to identify and classify sheep behaviour at pasture
    Alvarenga, F. A. P.
    Borges, I.
    Palkovic, L.
    Rodina, J.
    Oddy, V. H.
    Dobos, R. C.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2016, 181 : 91 - 99
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1994, MACHINE LEARNING ECM
  • [4] Multilayer perceptrons to approximate quaternion valued functions
    Arena, P
    Fortuna, L
    Muscato, G
    Xibilia, MG
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 1997, 10 (02) : 335 - 342
  • [5] Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data
    Bao, L
    Intille, SS
    [J]. PERVASIVE COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3001 : 1 - 17
  • [6] Bar D., 2010, P 1 N AM C PREC DAIR
  • [7] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [8] Caponetto R., 1993, Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, V15, P143, DOI 10.1177/014233129301500305
  • [9] Gyroscope vs. accelerometer measurements of motion from wrist PPG during physical exercise
    Casson, Alexander J.
    Galvez, Arturo Vazquez
    Jarchi, Delaram
    [J]. ICT EXPRESS, 2016, 2 (04): : 175 - 179
  • [10] THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF EQUIPMENT FOR THE AUTOMATIC RECORDING OF INGESTIVE BEHAVIOR IN SHEEP AND CATTLE
    CHAMBERS, ARM
    HODGSON, J
    MILNE, JA
    [J]. GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1981, 36 (02) : 97 - 105