Patient Experience and Quality of Urologic Cancer Surgery in US Hospitals

被引:23
作者
Shirk, Joseph D. [1 ]
Tan, Hung-Jui [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Jim C. [3 ]
Saigal, Christopher S. [1 ]
Litwin, Mark S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, 300 Stein Plaza,3rd Fl, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] VA Univ Calif Los Angeles, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Weill Cornell Sch Med, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
bladder neoplasm; kidney neoplasm; patient satisfaction; prostate neoplasm; surgical quality; CARE; COMPLICATIONS; SATISFACTION; OUTCOMES; PERSPECTIVES; IMPROVE; LENGTH; STAY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.30081
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Care interactions as perceived by patients and families are increasingly viewed as both an indicator and lever for high-value care. To promote patient-centeredness and motivate quality improvement, payers have begun tying reimbursement with related measures of patient experience. Accordingly, the authors sought to determine whether such data correlate with outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for genitourinary cancer. METHODS: The authors used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) data from 2009 through 2011. They identified hospital admissions for cancer-directed prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy, and measured mortality, hospitalization length, discharge disposition, and complications. Mixed effects models were used to compare the likelihood of selected outcomes between the top and bottom tercile hospitals adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Among a sample of 46,988 encounters, the authors found small differences in patient age, race, income, comorbidity, cancer type, receipt of minimally invasive surgery, and procedure acuity according to HCAHPS tercile (P<.001). Hospital characteristics also varied with respect to ownership, teaching status, size, and location (P<.001). Compared with patients treated in low-performing hospitals, patients treated in high-performing hospitals less often faced prolonged hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.92) or nursing-sensitive complications (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.99). No difference was found with regard to inpatient mortality, other complications, and discharge disposition (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample and HCAHPS data, the authors found a limited association between patient experience and surgical outcomes. For urologic cancer surgery, patient experience may be optimally viewed as an independent quality domain rather than a mechanism with which to improve surgical outcomes. (C) 2016 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2571 / 2578
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   What Are the Risk Factors of Negative Patient Experience? A Cross-Sectional Study in Chinese Public Hospitals [J].
Xie, Jinzhu ;
Hu, Yinhuan ;
Lu, Chuntao ;
Fu, Qiang ;
Carbone, Jason T. ;
Wang, Liuming ;
Deng, Lu .
INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2019, 56
[42]   Pay for Performance: Are Hospitals Becoming More Efficient in Improving Their Patient Experience? [J].
Stanowski, Anthony Charles ;
Simpson, Kit ;
White, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 60 (04) :268-284
[43]   Cancer services patient experience in England: quantitative and qualitative analyses of the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey [J].
Brookes, Gavin ;
Baker, Paul .
BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 13 (E3) :e1149-e1155
[44]   Association of Quality and Technology With Patient Mobility for Colorectal Cancer Surgery [J].
Aggarwal, Ajay ;
Han, Lu ;
Boyle, Jemma ;
Lewis, Daniel ;
Kuyruba, Angela ;
Braun, Michael ;
Walker, Kate ;
Fearnhead, Nicola ;
Sullivan, Richard ;
Van Der Meulen, Jan .
JAMA SURGERY, 2023, 158 (01) :E225461
[45]   Urologic surgery in gynecologic oncology: A large single-institution experience [J].
Costantini, B. ;
Vizzielli, G. ;
Fanfani, F. ;
D'Addessi, A. ;
Ercoli, A. ;
Avenia, N. ;
Margariti, P. A. ;
Gallotta, V. ;
Scambia, G. ;
Fagotti, A. .
EJSO, 2014, 40 (06) :756-761
[46]   Patient perspectives of care and process and outcome quality measures for heart failure admissions in US hospitals: how are they related in the era of public reporting? [J].
Dy, Sydney Morss ;
Chan, Kitty S. ;
Chang, Hsien-Yen ;
Zhang, Allen ;
Zhu, Junya ;
Mylod, Deirdre .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 28 (04) :522-528
[47]   Association of patient experience and the quality of hospital care [J].
Abdalla, Rawia ;
Pavlova, Milena ;
Groot, Wim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 35 (03)
[48]   Quality of Surgery in Malawi: Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Hernia Surgery Between District and Central Hospitals [J].
Gajewski, Jakub ;
Conroy, Ronan ;
Bijlmakers, Leon ;
Mwapasa, Gerald ;
McCauley, Tracey ;
Borgstein, Eric ;
Brugha, Ruairi .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (06) :1610-1616
[49]   Medication administration quality and health information technology: a national study of US hospitals [J].
Appari, Ajit ;
Carian, Emily K. ;
Johnson, M. Eric ;
Anthony, Denise L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 19 (03) :360-367
[50]   The Impact of Applying Quality Management Practices on Patient Centeredness in Jordanian Public Hospitals: Results of Predictive Modeling [J].
Hijazi, Heba H. ;
Harvey, Heather L. ;
Alyahya, Mohammad S. ;
Alshraideh, Hussam A. ;
Al abdi, Rabah M. ;
Parahoo, Sanjai K. .
INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2018, 55