Patient Experience and Quality of Urologic Cancer Surgery in US Hospitals

被引:23
作者
Shirk, Joseph D. [1 ]
Tan, Hung-Jui [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Jim C. [3 ]
Saigal, Christopher S. [1 ]
Litwin, Mark S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, 300 Stein Plaza,3rd Fl, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] VA Univ Calif Los Angeles, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Weill Cornell Sch Med, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
bladder neoplasm; kidney neoplasm; patient satisfaction; prostate neoplasm; surgical quality; CARE; COMPLICATIONS; SATISFACTION; OUTCOMES; PERSPECTIVES; IMPROVE; LENGTH; STAY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.30081
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Care interactions as perceived by patients and families are increasingly viewed as both an indicator and lever for high-value care. To promote patient-centeredness and motivate quality improvement, payers have begun tying reimbursement with related measures of patient experience. Accordingly, the authors sought to determine whether such data correlate with outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for genitourinary cancer. METHODS: The authors used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) data from 2009 through 2011. They identified hospital admissions for cancer-directed prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy, and measured mortality, hospitalization length, discharge disposition, and complications. Mixed effects models were used to compare the likelihood of selected outcomes between the top and bottom tercile hospitals adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Among a sample of 46,988 encounters, the authors found small differences in patient age, race, income, comorbidity, cancer type, receipt of minimally invasive surgery, and procedure acuity according to HCAHPS tercile (P<.001). Hospital characteristics also varied with respect to ownership, teaching status, size, and location (P<.001). Compared with patients treated in low-performing hospitals, patients treated in high-performing hospitals less often faced prolonged hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.92) or nursing-sensitive complications (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.99). No difference was found with regard to inpatient mortality, other complications, and discharge disposition (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample and HCAHPS data, the authors found a limited association between patient experience and surgical outcomes. For urologic cancer surgery, patient experience may be optimally viewed as an independent quality domain rather than a mechanism with which to improve surgical outcomes. (C) 2016 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2571 / 2578
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Variation in Surgical Spending Among the Highest Quality Hospitals for Cancer Surgery
    Diaz, Adrian
    Nuliyalu, Usha
    Dimick, Justin B. B.
    Nathan, Hari
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 276 (06) : E728 - E734
  • [22] Critical analysis of quality of life and cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patient's undergoing urologic oncology surgery: a systematic review
    Brooks, Nathan A.
    Kokorovic, Andrea
    McGrath, John S.
    Kassouf, Wassim
    Collins, Justin W.
    Black, Peter C.
    Douglas, James
    Djaladat, Hooman
    Daneshmand, Siamak
    Catto, James W. F.
    Kamat, Ashish M.
    Williams, Stephen B.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (06) : 1325 - 1342
  • [23] A Comparison of Surgical Quality and Patient Satisfaction Indicators Between VA Hospitals and Hospitals Near VA Hospitals
    Eid, Mark A.
    Barnes, J. Aaron
    Trooboff, Spencer W.
    Goodney, Philip P.
    Wong, Sandra L.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 255 : 339 - 345
  • [24] Readmissions after major urologic cancer surgery
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Sood, Akshay
    Ruhotina, Nedim
    Klett, Dane E.
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Schmid, Marianne
    Sun, Maxine
    Chang, Steven L.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (06) : 7537 - 7546
  • [25] Foodservice quality in South African hospitals: patient experiences
    Ncube, Lindiwe Julia
    Letsoalo, Maupi Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2019, 32 (03) : 599 - 610
  • [26] The quality of cancer patient experience: perspectives of patients, family members, providers and experts
    Wagner, Edward H.
    Bowles, Erin J. Aiello
    Greene, Sarah M.
    Tuzzio, Leah
    Wiese, Cheryl J.
    Kirlin, Beth
    Clauser, Steven B.
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (06): : 484 - 489
  • [27] Associations Between Nonclinical Services and Patient-Experience Outcomes in US Acute Care Hospitals
    Schiaffino, Melody K.
    Suzuki, Yukari
    Ho, Tarryn
    Finlayson, Tracy L.
    Harman, Jeffrey S.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2020, 7 (06): : 1086 - 1093
  • [28] Quality of life in urologic cancer patients: importance of and satisfaction with specific quality of life domains
    Leuteritz, Katja
    Richter, Diana
    Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Hinz, Andreas
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (03) : 759 - 767
  • [29] Patient-reported experience and quality of care for people with schizophrenia
    Aimola, L.
    Gordon-Brown, J.
    Etherington, A.
    Zalewska, K.
    Cooper, S.
    Crawford, M. J.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [30] Quality of care and emotional support from the inpatient cancer patient's perspective
    Singer, S.
    Goetze, H.
    Moebius, C.
    Witzigmann, H.
    Kortmann, R-D.
    Lehmann, A.
    Hoeckel, M.
    Schwarz, R.
    Hauss, J.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2009, 394 (04) : 723 - 731